the US is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and that people still fail to see that after the epstein files is actually shocking
While this is true
To be fair, you didn’t pick ubiased authors here. Neither of the authors is capable of saying anything negative of China.
For example, Paweł Wargan proponent of new Chinese imperialisms with extra steps - e.g. https://www.thecommunists.net/worldwide/global/multi-polar-world-order-is-multi-imperialism/
Who holds the political power in China
On executive level? Princelings.
In the NPC? Worker representatives are 15% vs 50% in the 1970’s. So… bureaucrats and the princelings?
It was, but the actual problem I have with the app is that it had 90% margin. Talk about quick and dirty cash grab.
I was under an impression that it was always “police station” with the quotes, to make it more sinister or smthing (and it was sold as something unlicensed by the country where ir was repoeted, obviously)
But the Evil Empire did prosecute someone in the case of those stations, as far as I can tell with no verdicts yet - but it seems to be some PIs?
Corporations should pay and be held accountable
No. The board and the directors should be personally responsible, and should be punished in addition to the corporation paying money at the minimum.
Not OC, but I do think its impossible that the goverment not made of worker class representstives can be socialistic (or where worker class is underrepresented).
Just by the simple fact they do not represent the wast masses, they will ultimately be disconnected from workers and/or serve their own petty bourgeoisie interests.
Agreed?
Even ancient Greeks knew that when the representatives in democracy come from rich families they always serve their families first (see sortition, a practice they used to offset that).
it’s always bad to be associated with them.
There are multiple countries sharing that sentiment though? E.g. every European neighbour of them except Belarus?
(At least according to Russian TV)
I vastly prefer suntan background and blackish font. White on black makes my eyes tired.
You must be pretty uneducated to think that USA did not mess with Europe economy, politics, society etc etc.
I mean for fuck sake, USA was both funding and directing terrorist attacks all over the Europe up until 1990s
(Years of Lead, Operation Gladio…)
I had an endoscopy (gastroscopy is the word I think?) once (tube from the front and they took something for biopsy) and I cried and gagged with snot during the whole procedure. I concur, I’d rather be out next time I have to have it.
Colonoscopy itself is no big deal, you’re out for the whole thing!
I mean if you’re in pain, sure, do it.
Otherwise I recommend staying awake (do ask your doctor though). I had a blast looking so deep inside me, but I had no issues (like tumors or inflammation) and the awful drink actually cured my constipation (the chronic constipation being the reason why I had colonoscopy in the first place).
Now you’re a bacon of just ice.
I’ll see myself out.
as a civilian until they roll out the tanks, and your guns can’t do shit against tanks.
CIA would like to present you Simple Sabotage Field Manual solving all your needs in that department.
Huh? That is the literal opposite of what I said. Like, diametrically opposite.
The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode. There’s no semantic retrieval step.
No, that’s exactly what you wrote.
Now, with this change
SUMM -> human reviews
That would be fixed, but will work only for small KBs, as otherwise the summary would be exhaustive.
Case in point: assume a Person model with 3-7 facts per Person. Assume small 3000 size set of Persons. How would the SUMM of work? Do you expect a human to verify that SUMM? How are you going to converse with your system to get the data from that KB Person set? Because to me that sounds like case C, only works for small KBs.
Again: the proposition is not “the model will never hallucinate.”. It’s “it can’t silently propagate hallucinations without a human explicitly allowing it to, and when it does, you trace it back to source version”.
Fair. Except that you are still left with the original problem of you don’t know WHEN the information is incorrect if you missed it at SUMM time.
The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode
Oh boy. So hallucination will occur here, and all further retrievals will be deterministically poisoned?
So… Rag with extra steps and rag summarization? What about facts that are not rag retrieval?
A very tailored to llms strengths benchmark calls you a liar.
https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-flash-everything-you-need-to-know (A month ago the hallucination rate was ~50-70%)
I want to believe you, but that would mean you solved hallucination.
Either:
A) you’re lying
B) you’re wrong
C) KB is very small
deleted by creator
~1950.
Same book - “socialist in words, imperialist in deeds”? But that doesn’t really matter, as you’re just gonna cherry pick other Lenin quotes at me like if its the Bible. Or call me names.
Nonetheless, I highly recommend the article I linked - but since it might paint a picture that you’re unable to comprehend (or unwilling to entertain), you will of course not read it.
Edit: and if you don’t like that source, here’s another fav of mine https://spectrejournal.com/one-should-not-camouflage-capitalist-and-imperialist-china-as-socialist/.