It’s useful because that word means the corruption will be accepted and nothing will be done.

The economic situation is complex.

I, too, can also make up big numbers.

230,000!

I would definitely trust this person with the nuclear launch codes.

We know.

Never. If it’s worth dying for, it’s worth being homeless.

This is what I call junk open source. They use the open source label, but it’s not really open source in spirit. The license is restrictive and I’d recommend against using any such software in favor of something that’s actually, properly open source. If you’re bothering to self host, I feel like this freedom is important to most users.

Also, I think this is an advertisement and should be removed.

I’ll no legal expert but that sounds kind of like manslaughter.

I’m sure nobody will be charged.

Before the Internet, your argument would just be wrong or uninformed and you wouldn’t know what the answer was supposed to be.

I can’t do that because it’s real. I just waded into that cesspool of a site to verify for myself.

They’re already registered Republicans.

Careful. Idaho Republicans could be into it.

Clearly, this is the most important issue impacting your typical working American family today.

It’s really hard for me to say. On one hand, the ingredients are there. On the other, the FBI is incredibly inept these days especially, to make such a conspiracy seem hard almost too hard for the FBI to pull off.

It alarms me, and I’m but a poor layman.

This is 100% not a requirement to receive government money. The vast majority is not spent for the benefit of taxpayers.

Generally, the Epstein class would like us all to die. It’s just easier to go after the most vulnerable people first, but make no mistake; it’s a death cult. We are all in line for the chopping block.

They then proceeded to divert the flight to the wrong airport once it finally did takeoff.

I love this game. It’s chill.

Definitely share your initial concern. Without strong review processes to ensure that every line of code follows the intent of the human developer, there’s no way of knowing what exactly is in there and the implications for the human users. And I’m not just talking about bugs.

They say it’s reviewed, but the temptation to blindly trust is there. In this case, developer appears to have taken some care.

The code was written by Cursor and Claude, but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings.

Let us hope so. Handle with care to ensure responsibility is not offloaded to a machine instead of a person.