ᛋᛋKKKᚱaᛏ¢HHᛊᚦ

i support the smol bean democratic US presidents war crimes

do you not listen to yourself or??

No it isn’t derived from horseshoe fallacy because the dems arent left. They’re far right warhawks who openly support genocide. They have an “America first” mindset, believe in “American exceptionalism”, are zionists to the marrow of their bones, believe in militarization, warfare, built concentration camps for migrants and have people chanting “blue no matter who”. They are the exact same party in a different color with an even stupider mascot.

I know? What’s your point?

wtf is this racist shit whats wrong with you

What do you think it is?

We really hate vibecoding and AI unless they are used to totally own tankies

Yeah these people are known to brand people with the swastika of david

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4udFTRmSADU

by visual capitalist

hmmmm wonder if they had any agenda or ideological bias in their estimation of china

No need to sterilise, reusable, quicker to decompose I think it’s a superb idea.

Catharsis tbh. I am german and it’s stressful af since I can never know how much of a freak any given person here. feddit.org stands for pretty much everything wrong in this country, especially for what passes here an “left”. Look at the fedditor freakshow in this thread for example: https://lemmy.ml/post/45151394

What where those canucks doing?

fedditors not beating the zionist allegations in a hundred years edit: they actually can’t see this bc. I got banned for calling out their zionism, so I can just say that I think we should be boiling them alive without starting a slapfight.

We should topple the EU then tbh

Why do we have to keep fighting our own government for our rights? Why can’t our government just represent us?

I mean they kidnapped maduro and are trying him under new york law so…

What “principles” were holding you back from gloryposting?

leo point meme

It seems to me that dialectical materialism is a tool for post hoc analysis of society that is useful for constructing narratives and not much else.

have you not heard of the russian and chinese revolutions or what am I missing here? Two of the largest nations in the world mobilised their masses, led them into war against the ruling class and won. They lead huge literacy and industrialization campaigns that allowed their nations to leapfrog most other nations and made them able to compete with europe and the us in terms of technological advancements. Their leaders, now famous worldwide, are thought leaders in dialectical materialism and how to apply it. As a more concrete example Marx successfully predicted the monopolisation of market segments for instance. Which was a wild prediction to make in the 19th century when every town had their own factories and competition among them was fierce.

Yes words have different meanings in different contexts. “Blockade” has a common meaning and a different meaning in graph theory. But if you used it in its graph theory meaning unbidden in an online discussion thread that wasn’t already about graph theory, and without introducing the context of graph theory into the conversation first, then I would say you are using the word incorrectly.

You are free to do so of course, but there are quite a few people around who have read about imperialism and got the meaning behind the comment immediately, making an outright statement like “i mean contradiction in the diamat sense” seem superfluous to me.

Try George Politzer “Elementary principles of philosophy” maybe? Its a term coming from Hegel, it makes more sense in german (Widerspruch literally means contradictory statement, e.g. parents might say “I don’t want to hear a Widerspruch!” to their kids when they’re refusing to cooperate).

I also don’t know what you mean by “dialectical materialism kool-aid”, it’s a useful toolbox for analysing society not some belief system one professes. And yeah someone using that toolbox will use the names those tools are called by other people who use the same toolbox. If you don’t use diamat, then the names won’t make much sense to you. E.g. I had to present a math paper where the person destructed a graph into “blocks”, and called that destructure a “blockade”. Which doesn’t make much sense, when we think of a “blockade” it’s an obstacle, not something we want on our way to prove a theorem, but within this framework it’s a tool that was used to find a certain type of graph within the larger graph and not at all an obstacle.