Yep and I also want to add that you can use compose.yml to limit the CPU and RAM utilisation of each container, which can help in some cases.

You’re doing i right. Playing cool games with your kids sounds like a blast and some great memories :)

Oh I see. Most of Australian cities are actually suburban and have had wider footpaths than necessary, as well as parking buffers. It’s trivially easy to just convert one side into a protected bike lane.

I still argue that in a lot of urban areas where the road has swelled to its natural limit, depending on the road, it can be good to reduce the road by one lane and add a protected bike lane. But this is situational. Not every road needs a bike lane. But there should be bike lanes every so often, so people can safely get close to their destination without bothering motorists.

It’s too much of a mental simulation to imagine how reducing car lanes becomes a benefit to those that must drive because of a reduction of traffic and potential improvement to overall flow.

Fair enough. I agree that reducing a road by a lane can improve congestion, it isn’t always the case, and isn’t a simple sell.

They think of it as a zero-sum game

But it’s not.

The reason you need more lanes is because of a growing population using a fixed set of roadways. As you add protected bike lanes, more and more people opt for using a bicycle. This means fewer people on the road, negating the need for the extra roadway.

If you spend limited tax dollars on bike infrastructure, driving infrastructure will not receive necessary maintenance.

I’m not sure what you personally believe, but this is not true at all.

I’m Australian, so maybe my experience with cyclists and cycling infrastructure is different. We usually extend our roads and have a green lane for cyclists, or even dedicated cycling ways alongside the footpath (sidewalk).

People here whinge that these protected cycle ways get built. And I’m just baffled.

When car drivers are stupid they get in a small prang and have to pay the excess on someone else’s insurance.

When cyclist are stupid, they end up in a hospital or the morgue.

I’m Aussie, so unfortunately it’s targeted at Australians driving huge American pickup trucks. :(

Yes, I get lab burnout. I do not want to be fiddling with stuff after my day job. You should give yourself a break and do something else after hours, my dude.

BUT

I do not miss GUIs. Containers are a massive win in terms because they are declarative, reproducible, and can be version controlled.

Docker in and of itself is not the problem here, from my understanding. You can and should trim the container down.

Also it’s not a “whole nested computer”, like a virtual machine. It’s only everything above the kernel, because it shares its kernel with the host. This makes them pretty lightweight.

It’s sometimes even sometimes useful to run Rust or C++ code in a Docker container, for portability, provided you of course do it right. For Rust, it typically requires multiple build steps to bring the container size down.

Basically, the people making these Docker containers suck donkey balls.

Containers are great. They’re a huge win in terms of portability, reproducibility, and security.

Just how we do things down under mate

Nissan gave heaps of money to Japan’s facists for their colonies. Look up “comfort women” if you want to know what was done with the money.

If I’m the dad, I’m lawyering up. This is going to be a very expensive lesson for the school

Congratulations on the opportunity to see new people🥳