• eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    if you haven’t noticed by now, im an incompatibilist (i do not believe determinism is compatible with free will)

    we fundamentally disagree on what a ‘decision’ is. you believe that logical possibility is enough for free will, i don’t.

    The agent made its decision based on knowledge, reasoning, experience, the risks, the morals

    i argue that if you accept determinism, this is an illusion. you believe you are making a decision based on free will because it is logically possible that you can take any of the available options, but it in actuality it is no different than the marble, you are physically bound to a specific outcome.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Do you think knowledge, reasoning, experience, and risks do not play any role in our decisions?

      Sure, it is inevitable that we will make the decision we make, but it’s not that the marble will fall down every time that makes our choices significant, it’s the fact that we don’t arbitrarily make decisions.

      If, because you know about determinism, you stop bothering to learn about the world, there will be a different outcome, even if that was inevitable, that’s how you influence the world. Free will doesn’t mean anything and isn’t important.

      Even if there was free will, those things would be vastly more important than it. Free will is totally unimportant.