I noticed that AI posts tend to get reported so I figured maybe we just make them officially disallowed.

Agree/disagree? Post and tell us why!

    • Artwork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Absolutely incomparable technologies…
      Please, at least, finally, seriously consider the terms, and technologies in question, @can@sh.itjust.works (aka. TrashCan).

      You compare a calculator-like… or a clock-like marvelous solid system without any feedback logic, with a system as unpredictable LLM with an algorithm that is designed to change the output on every iteration.

      You turn off the modular system, your reset it, and you may trust it to start over.
      LLM? LLM has its indefinitely accumulated data set initially “trained” on numerous copyrighted human work and meatground into pieces no one is responsible for.

      I am sorry, but have you seen works of Colin Benders even?
      In the former, within a modular synthetic system, you execute commands and control the electricity and logic flow manually.
      In the latter, you prompt in dear hope, and wish all Gods that token-burning input will finally produce an “output” you want.

      AI art is not art. It is a horrible void-empty bloody nonsense no one I know would like invest their finite life time into…

      Human music is art, that is supposed to support people in communication that is impossible to express in general terms. This why I listen to music in the infinitely magnificent world we appeared… I listen to people. You?

      I’m going to open a cable shop next to where this man lives…
      Source (Colin Benders Live at Amsterdam Dance Event 2016…) [comments]

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I appreciate the detailed response. I want you to know the point I was trying to convey aligns with yours. They are clearly incomparable, of course, I was strictly struggling with wording since the terminology we were used to now commonly refers to other things.

        Edit: also, I make music, and I’m inspired by human artists expressing their experiences, we’re on the same page

        Do not read too much into meme quickly made a couple months ago. This topic does interest me however and I’m happy to discuss it further, but know I’m not sure someone that needs to be convinced of the merits of human creativity

        • Artwork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I see. Thank you, and I appreciate the clarification in response!
          The dear terminology, languages, and misunderstandings… Isn’t that why art exists in the first place, indeed…
          To support the creativity mentioned:

          Obviously, there’s no creativity in AI, and especially in art.

          AI makes no art, and there’s nothing to search for in it, also considering the amount of different people works and effort meatground into digital limited/sampled quantized data. It’s noise.

          There’s no place for a machine in it, otherwise it becomes limited, lacking, and lifeless.
          Art exists for people, us the humans to communicate with each other through time and narrow channels as general languages.

          > “There are always two people in every picture…” ~ Ansel Adams

          Source (AI struggles with true creativity compared to humans, study finds…)