• auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The whole reason The Dress became a phenomenon is because there’s just enough visual ambiguity to make multiple interpretations plausible. That doesn’t mean your perception is more accurate — it just means your brain committed quickly to one version and stuck with it. Congrats, but calling it a skill issue only shows a lack of understanding about how perception works. If this were about raw visual ability, neuroscientists wouldn’t still be studying it. You didn’t “solve” anything — you just landed on one of two stable percepts and assumed it was the only correct one. And funnily enough, seeing it as white and gold might actually reflect a system tuned to compensate more for low-light environments, possibly allowing better function in situations where light is limited. So if anything, you might be the one running on default settings.

      • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Funny how “visual talent” doesn’t come with reading comprehension. I sense this is important to you because you lack actual skills.

              • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Not emotions, just objectively you are struggling to grasp really basic stuff. Either wilful ignorance or just half daft.

                • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Btw, quick note, idk if your perception is just so malformed that you can’t tell, but the first mention of “skill issue” was about where I started trolling you. I’m letting you know because you are clearly quite vulnerable to feeding the troll.

                • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Idk, you pretty clearly are and have been using ad hominem attacks.

                  What was I struggling to grasp again? Which part? The idea that it was ambiguous?

                  • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 hours ago

                    You don’t have a monopoly on bad faith arguments, ad hom doesnt equal emotional it just means I’ve disregarded your input as valuable and I’m winding you up.

                    You struggled to grasp pretty much any of it.