• workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    White and gold viewers aren’t saying the pixels are literally white and gold—they’re saying the colors they perceive match most closely with that label

    I think all of the white-gold people are really condescending, explaining how their perception is correct and how blue-black people don’t understand the image. Also, if they explain how the image looks white-gold enough, that the blue-black people will be wrong.

    • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      explaining how their perception is correct and how blue-black people don’t understand the image.

      Well the ones that do understand the image by definition won’t need it explained. There’s no ‘correct’, if we’re talking pixels/digital representation, it’s white-gold (or light-blue and brown if we’re being pedantic), if we’re talking about what the physical dress is, it’s blue and black.

      If it were a white and gold dress and the light was reversed to shadow it’d likely be the other way about; some people would interpret it as the pixels displayed (blue and black), and others would subconsciously revert it to white and gold.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        You’re saying it’s actually white-gold? Do you think the color on the left is actually white? White is on the right here, for your reference:

        In the colors below, you think they are the same color? Brown is not the same color as gold

        If you were tasked with painting something gold, would you paint it brown instead?