Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 8 days agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1664arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1650arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square65linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 days agoIt doesn’t anymore =( 5e uses diagonal = 5’
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days agoAlternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 days agoOh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 days agoWell anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days ago4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances. Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
It doesn’t anymore =(
5e uses diagonal = 5’
Alternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
Oh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances.
Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.