Anyone know if this is true or not?

  • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know this is not going to be well received here, but we as a society do need to do something to prevent children from being able to access pornography. We are just now getting research showing the detrimental effects of social media and internet pornography on developing children’s brains. There hasn’t been concrete evidence until recently, and now we know. Things do have to change.

    However, this needs to be done with as little information as possible collected and distributed. Zero-knowledge proofs should be used to establish that a person is above a certain age without telling the site what their age actually is. This can be done, however I do imagine they are going to skip past all of that and just go to collecting all the information possible.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No one is saying that kids should be able to access pornography. People are saying that it shouldn’t be the states job to raise your children for you.

      Effectively blocking pornography for everyone in the country unless you dox yourself to shady websites is not the answer. The answer is developing the tools and simplifying processes required to stop children accessing these things on the device and local network level and putting those tools in the hands of parents. Doing this is almost certainly orders of magnitude cheaper than trying to police the internet

      The Great Firewall of Britain is a frankly stupid concept.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        People are saying that it shouldn’t be the states job to raise your children for you.

        This logic does not hold up in most other cases. We stopped selling alcohol and cigarettes unless you dox yourself to shady gas stations and stores. Parents should be able to stop their kids from being able to buy that shit, why should the stores have to do more work to enforce it? You’re seriously going to inconvenience all the adults that can legally buy it just to prevent kids from being able to buy it? Why can’t we keep our cigarette vending machines? Surely it’s cheaper just to have parents control their kids, rather than manage every single store in the country.

        The internet is different, and it’s currently the wild west. Because it’s different, it’s also possible to prove your age without doxing yourself (like I mentioned with zero-knowledge proof). It is possible to prove you are over an age without telling anyone anything about yourself. Unlike being required to give your drivers license/ID card to buy alcohol or cigarettes which gives all of your information to every person you hand it to.

        Not all parents are going to have the know-how to lock down a child’s internet access. They may need to use 3rd party tools, many of which would cost money. Does it really make more sense to have parents try to secure every place a kid may access internet pornography rather than securing it at the source? Again, if done correctly, it can be done privately and securely. I am not advocating that we give our ID to every sketchy internet site. I am advocating for a widespread secure and standardized solution. That makes more sense than to put all of the onus on the parents.

        • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We stopped selling alcohol and cigarettes unless you dox yourself to shady gas stations and stores.

          Both of which famously keep databases of everyone’s IDs, and require transmitting your ID over who-knows-what network to who-knows-where.

          Oh, wait, no they don’t.

          Again, if done correctly, it can be done privately and securely. I am not advocating that we give our ID to every sketchy internet site. I am advocating for a widespread secure and standardized solution.

          Right, and such a solution will ultimately just require everyone to trust the fact that it’s been “done privately and securely”

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        What about the devices you don’t own?

        And regardless, how are parents that struggle to setup their email going to keep their kid from accessing porn? What would you have them do? Install a 3rd party software? Setup a local DNS filter? Prevent them from using devices that can access the internet? When it is as easy as googling “naked girl” how on earth are parents going to stop them from access it. The answer? The aren’t. There is nothing even the most diligent parent can do to stop them from accessing it while it is so readily accessible.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You haven’t demonstrated what harm comes from googling naked girl and seeing boobs.

          If you want devices with parental control you will need to pay for them.

          Devices like school computers already have such. This won’t stop a determined person from borrowing their friends phone and googling naked girl but that is a reasonable trade off honestly.

          I don’t want to turn the entire Internet into 1984 so your kids doesn’t see boobs until he’s 18