Saw this in my adguard home query logs.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    even tho most low level searches and recommendations gonna point towards brave as the private browser, all you need to just look at the options. its datafarming, its running in the background randomly, its an nftbro chrome.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can disable this in the settings. Nobara ships with Brave now but with all of the telemetry and crypto BS turned off out of the box.

    • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a shame this is necessary, to be honest. It’s the same argument with Windows users: “you can just run a debloater and fiddle with the registry to disable tracking”. It shouldn’t be needed in the first place.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t think you can say the same as MS plays shitty cat and mouse games and is constantly patching the workarounds. And the changes required are much more involved than just toggling a switch. And Brave won’t randomly toggle it back on after an update or just blatantly ignore it altogether.

  • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What browser should I use on mobile? I use Librewolf on desktop since it runs fine, and the vertical tabs are great, and it looks nice.

    On mobile though there’s a lot of problems with the browser space:

    • Chrome: runs great but is obviously not good for privacy
    • Firefox: what most people recommend, but it has terrible performance, looks not great, and doesn’t even have more than basic fingerprinting protection, and literally includes ads by default. It’s also less secure on Android because they don’t do per site process isolation, and the memory allocator is worse.
    • Brave: people tend to dislike brave here, but it runs well (since it’s chromium based) and has at least better fingerprinting protection.

    What other options are there?

      • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        yeah lemme just pull out safari on android and linux for its insane fingerprinting protection and great content blocking support

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      hmmm

      i never get the performance part.

      what the fuck are you doing where you can even notice performance differences?

      nobody should use vanilla firefox. the extensions are the vital part of it

    • Nonagon ∞ Orc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tbh firefox performs great and works for me, and its issues can be fixed with extensions and settings, both on desktop and mobile. I never looked for anything else myself. I also like to use a browser that is not chromium-based, I do not want google to have the monopoly.

      maybe I am just not picky, but if you need more privacy than what can be achieved with a hardened firefox config you might be better off using TOR at that point.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    No. At least not in the way most people expect.

    It does block some tracking and ads that Chrome alone allows or explicitly adds. But it simply shifts that tracking to Brave. The idea was that you’d still get the benefits of that tracking by giving all of your data to Brave instead. I honestly never was convinced by this considering your data is still being sold, just by a different company so it doesn’t sound much better to me. Supposedly, according to them, Brave is more trustworthy and gives you more control over what they track and sell, but I don’t trust that business model. There’s no real incentive for them to do what they said they would.

      • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It gets pushed often by reactionaries as an “anti-woke” browser LOL its a complete piece of shit. It’s got crypto, tracking, NFTs, AI and ads baked in. Literally everything I hate about the tech industry rolled up into one package. I’d rather use Chrome, even.

        • irmadlad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          anti-woke

          I find it quite interesting those who protest being woke. The word ‘woke’ has a long standing meaning to the Black community. The usual suspects using the word ‘anti-woke’ are almost always American Republicans, and their track record of racial animosity has preceded itself for generations like the stench of a rotting corpse. Given the choice between being woke or asleep, I’ll take woke any day.

  • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just use Firefox for gods sakes, Brave is a complete joke of a browser especially when it comes to privacy.

  • 68silver@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can stop it in settings just like any other browser. I still will use Brave as my choice of browsers.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Depends on what you mean by “private”. I would not trust it much, but it’s not a bad Chromium based browser when you need one. Use something like LibreWolf for much more privacy out of the box.

    • monovergent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      For the best privacy when you do need a Chromium-based browser, the ungoogled-chromium flatpak is an excellent choice.

  • NinjaTurtle@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t a lot of browsers by default have pings set up to track usage? Check the privacy section. There is usually a check box about sending daily pings to whatever company made the browser to track usage.

    Not sure about the variations though

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Any browser does it, it is needed for several reasons, every browser need to know the amount of users it has to calculate it’s market share. But statistical telemetries are not a privacy issue, it’s like an employee which count the amount of cars and trucks on a highway, to know if it is needed to enlarge the highway or not. A browser need to know it for its capacity of servers and sync, if they offer it. Normally the telemetries includes in which OS is used the browser and in which country, all this is legit and not a privacy problem.

      Bad only when it also include logs and profiling of user data and activity, as Chrome and EDGE do, and worse if this is sold to third parties. Decent browser don’t do it.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use Vivaldi, it’s IMHO the only decent Chromium browser, apart European, with a good privacy, no logs, no tracking no third party investors. great services and community.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yes, it’s proprietary because some script parts are. It’s not so easy to go full OpenSource for an Chromium browser which is more an online suite than a simple browser, because Google and M$ will kill to be able to fork it for Chrome and EDGE, which will have catastrophic aftermaths for all other Chromium browsers, include Vivaldi. Way easier to be OpenSource for simpler Chromium or Gecko forks. Anyway I think in a market saturated with browsers (over 100 different), beeing OpenSource isn’t in the main interest for the user anymore, prevailing more the ethics and transparency of the manufactor, 100% given in Vivaldi. Apart, as say, it’s the only decent browser from the EU on level eye with the US big Brother browsers. Alternatively there is Mullvad, butit is , apart of the privacy features, a very basic browser, more an platform for the Mullvad VPN, no own sync, only with Mozilla, Konqueror with the KHTML engine by KDE is discontinued, same as sadly the French UR browser. Thats it.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve never really had a comfortable feeling about Brave. I have no substantiating evidence, it just seems a bit squirrely. Besides the Tor browser, LibreWolf, Waterfox, and FireFox are the only acceptable browsers as far as I’m concerned, tho I don’t come down on those seeking an alternative to Google Chrome.

      • erock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Librefox has been awesome. Once you get the hang of enabling cookies for specific sites it mostly just works. Although Fastmail keeps logging me out for some reason

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Far as I remember any browser in iOS is a scam anyways because Apple forces any browser in their platform to be based off of the same engine as Safari.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            AFAIK at least in the EU because have to admit also browsers with a different engine as WebKit. WebKit is same as Blink a fork from the KHTML engine by KDE, butway less advanced as Blink or Gecko, who outscore WebKit in modern webformats. This is why Apple don’t want other browsers which make Safari obsolete. Anyway, sooner or later Safari will be the next IE.

        • irmadlad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          General practice, I do not use my phone as a compute platform. I realize others cannot do the same all the time. I do run firefox and a VPN which has an adblocker as part of it’s tool set.

  • dangrousperson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    From Wiki:

    Brave Software was founded in 2015 by Brendan Eich, creator of JavaScript and former Mozilla CEO who left the organization after coming under fire for his support of eliminating the right of same-sex couples to marry […]

    and

    In August 2016, the company had received at least US$7 million in angel investments from venture capital firms, including Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund […]

    Should tell you everything you need to know.

    I’d say being ‘privacy focused’ is just a stick to get non-tech savy/gullible people that want to protect their privacy to use it, without thinking about it twice. Personally, I believe there is 0% chance they don’t sell (or simply give) all data they can to Peter Thiel and Palantir.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      …also to Facebook, also one of the investors. Brave has good privacy protections, but they are selective.