This is definitely on the horizon and future generations won’t even be aware of a time when you didn’t pay a subscription for every aspect of life. (TikTok screencap)

    • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Came here to post that. More context: Short story by Cory Doctorow about apartments having mandatory proprietary toasters that only toast bread baked by the company , which then goes out of business, which makes the authorization handshake fail, which makes all the toasters useless, and then plot and stuff happens. It’s a good read.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Actually (put on fedora) a “smart” fridge is not necessarily bad.

    No what absolutely sucks is lock-in and enshittification.

    If you were to imagine a FLOSS OSHW fridge that used e.g. OpenFoodFacts and data from your purchases, e.g. OCRing your grocery list receipt or online purchases and genuinely helped with stock, recipes, diet, etc why not.

    The WHOLE point is control, it’s not the technology.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah. People hate “smart” stuff and IOT and i sometime do too, but owning a bit of automation tech makes me realise the shitty thing about these tech is we’re being forced to use it for even the basic shit and in THEIR term, which mean they can brick your stuff if they want to.

      I have two aircond that comes with IOT that i can connect for extra feature, but that’s entirely optional stuff, i can operate it like a normal aircond. We need stronger consumer protection and more personal control.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        “smart” stuff […] these tech

        That’s why picking the right tech matters. My heuristic is that if you need a proprietary app, it’s NOT going to be on your term, hard pass.

        If you do need some connectivity, it’s also probably bad.

        If you do not need connectivity and it’s interoperable via standards then and only then maybe it can be good.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get they can’t support an old device forever, but then a local API should be available by law.

        • Lemmee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s come so far! It used to just be for tech nerds and privacy extremists. But it’s so easy to use now, everyone who wants to enjoy the IoT world again without losing personal control can do it!

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s cooking absolutely but we need a whole class of contributors that only work with support and uiux that really enjoy helping people because there’s always that one little thing that’s vague in the docs and obvious to everyone else

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly, we don’t need to ditch computers and smartphones and go “back to nature” like some people say. We need control.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Counterpoint - we do not need appliances capable of running operating systems with userlands. A pre-programmed microcontroler should be more than enough for most appliances

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          An ESP32 based microcontroller can also send the temperature over ZigBee, smart devices and microcontrollers are not mutually exclusive

      • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hate that any new tech nowadays is caveated by this perversion of right to ownership.

        It’s gotten to the point that I either actively seek older tech, or just go for even more expensive niche tech by small private tech players like Framework. But then my worry becomes, are these small private tech companies actually principled or are they just waiting on their exit strategy to be bought out?

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Theoretically, I suppose that you could reflash your fridge. It’s unlikely that it’s running a dedicated embedded system nowadays. It has to be either android or Linux (or maybe Windows if they’re idiots, which is always a possibility).

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        you could reflash your fridge

        Well yes, but honestly that’s swimming upstream. I always discourage reverse engineering or hacking unless you do it for learning and entertainment purposes. If you love the challenge it’s amazing. If you want to use the tool they you are giving away money to corporations you do not trust and you put a lot of weight on your shoulders to maintain all that over time.

  • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Smart fridges don’t even improve storing food.

    I won’t buy a smart fridge until they can play Tetris with the food inside.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      But without a smart fridge, how am I supposed to play Doom in my kitchen?

        • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Smart tvs aren’t as bad of a concept as smart fridges. A smart TV is better at being a TV than it otherwise would be, purely because it is smart. A fridge doesn’t have that. There is no way that a fridge can be better at being a fridge by being smart.

          • toddestan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The one smart feature I could see useful on a fridge would be for it to send me some sort of notification if the door is left open. Perhaps it could also send a notification if the temperature inside gets too warm (or too cold) - which assuming the door is shut would probably mean the fridge is broken.

            With that said, I’m perfectly happy with a dumb box that gets cold inside and has a simple electro-mechanical switch to turn the light on when the door is opened.

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Or…
              Beep if the door is open.
              Regulate the temperature automatically.
              No AI.

          • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I disagree. The one of the few smart thing i don’t want in my house is a smart tv, because it’s really just a subpar computer being build into a TV, and higher spec cost too much. I don’t want to change a TV every 3 to 5 years because the computer part degraded and make using the TV impossible. I can use my PC for that.

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            A smart TV is better at being a TV than it otherwise would be

            I think that depends on what you want from your TV. If you just want it to have a video input to stream stuff from somewhere else, smart TVs are typically worse because they take more time to boot up.

            • Lucy :3@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Also, they spy on you, can be bricked by the manufacturer, can therefore be used to extort money from you after buying it (depending on your country’s laws) and lock you into one ecosystem. The profit margin off of that is so high that “smart” TVs are always much cheaper than normal TVs, even with development costs and higher hardware costs. So you are the product.

              And if you actually want to stream Netsucks or smth, plugging in your Laptop where you’re already logged in is much more convenient than using a native app on the TV. And ofc you don’t have to use some broken, outdated YouTube unshittifier that Google keeps breaking on there, you can just use piped/invidious in your Laptops/Mini-PCs browser. Also, not having any apps on a fucking TV means not requiring Network access, so no spying, updating etc. anyway.

              • NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Your comment represents the disconnect with most consumers and maybe it’s why you can’t see the reason most people don’t fight back against smart tvs.

                First, just because a smart TV “can” be bricked by a manufacturer does not mean they all deliberately do so or use that as a means to extort you. If my tv bricked because of an update, and wasn’t remedied for free by the manufacturer, guess which maker I’m not buying from for my next tv? Not to mention the lawsuits.

                Next, I’m struggling to figure how connecting a laptop to a tv is more convenient than a built in app. I have done every type of TV setup but no extra devices has always been a lot simpler than more devices.

                I completely understand your concerns of privacy and a YouTube app that can’t block ads, but let’s not pretend that it’s all bad news.

                • Lucy :3@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s bricked as soon as a company is bought up, and the new company has no interest in continuing support or wants customers to buy a new or their product. The lawsuits are non existent, because due to forced arbitration clauses present in almost all contracts today, you cannot sue. The most prominent, recent example being Disney not allowing a customer to sue them for a death in their park, because the dead person has used a free trial of Disney+ and therefore agreed to forced arbitration. Video by Louis Rossmann. (Generally, Louis covers a lot of such cases and maintains a wiki where the cases and companies are collected.) Also, there’s no way to just buy from another manufacturer and be happy, because it’s all of them. And the shareholders, which are the only ones that are relevant for what a company does, do not care if they damage the reputation and run the company into the ground long-term, as long as the numbers went up quickly (from forcing subscriptions, ads and/or tracking onto customers, or discontinuing a product in favor of another one. With a normal TV, you now have an outdated but working product, as neither HDMI, cable TV nor satellite will randomly change or need updates. Something connecting to the internet and requiring permanent security updates for apps and OS does. So either you will suddenly lose most functionality, the manufacturer (or rather, new owner) sees this as a good way to justify just bricking it or the new owners will first implement forced arbitration if not present already (which you have to accept, otherwise you can’t use the product), force said subs/ads/tracking, then rugpull and close the manufacturer. Good luck suing against suing against a company that does not exist anymore, and disallows you to sue.
                  Paid a few million for a company, got that worth in trained workers, customers to scam and already collected data, and got many more millions from implementing said stuff. Bottomline: “Earned” many, many millions. Bonus: There’s a good chance the consumer buys a new TV from you, because they don’t know who fucked them.

                  All of those things are real cases, more or less common, documented in thousands of videos of Louis.

                  Most people I’ve met have streaming services set up on their laptop already. From start to finish, plugging in your Laptop and typing soap2day.pe or netflix.com is much easier than connecting to wifi or ethernet, installing the app on the TV, and logging in. Just to disover that streaming service XY is not available on the TV due to an old OS, license issues, compatibility issues (as eg. Netflix has special requirements, such as x86_64 and not ARM and RISCV for >720p and playing in general, iirc). On your laptop (or whatever), everything’s already set up.
                  That is, if you have a laptop or similar of course.

                • balsoft@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Next, I’m struggling to figure how connecting a laptop to a tv is more convenient than a built in app. I have done every type of TV setup but no extra devices has always been a lot simpler than more devices.

                  It is infinitely more convenient for me.

                  Having to navigate through an obtuse UI just to open an app, then search with an on-screen keyboard by moving the cursor with a D-pad on the remote is just awful. Besides, a lot of smart TVs don’t allow you to sideload which forces you into either ads or subscriptions for a lot of things.

                  I have my desktop sitting next to the TV, already plugged in, so when I want to watch something I just turn the TV on, search for whatever I need on definitely legal website, download it in a definitely legal way, open mpv with subs and start watching.

            • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              There’s also a longevity mismatch. The streaming device goes obsolete much faster than the display. At worst, you’ve got a bunch of buttons snd icons for dead services or “your device is no longer supported” tutning your home theatre into a dead mall.

              It’s sort of like when they used to make low-end TVs with VCRs and DVD players built in. Nobody was doing that on top of the line sets because you wanted to keep it for 10 years, and the DVD player would give out much sooner.

              I think one brand tried to make a modular component to allow for smart upgrades, but without industry standards, it was a predestined dead end. Thry should have just out a slot in the cabinet sized to fit a Roku/Fire stick and let customers swap them every few years.

              • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Smart TV is just a dumb TV with an OS. Just factory reset it, refuse to give it WiFi, and it’ll basically function like a dumb TV. The longer boot time only happens after it loses power, otherwise it’s in a sleep mode.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nope. A TV’s sole job is to shit photons into my eyes. I have different appliances to tell it which photons those should be.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            A true smart fridge would be great.

            An actual smart fridge would do things like scan everything you put in it, so you’d know that you had leftover lasagne from 4 days ago that was about to go bad. It would know its full contents, and where they were (like that you had some kimchi on the 4th shelf in the back), and when they were going to expire. And it would do it without you having to change how you used the fridge, like stopping to carefully scan everything you put in or took out. AFAIK some smart fridges do some of that, but not all.

          • Jestzer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s all about marketing. “This smart fridge uses quantum AI technology to do neural scans of the contents of your fridge, allowing it to adjust the temperature and humidity perfectly for your food, making it crisp and moist!”

            • amotio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean, smart fridge COULD be scanning its contents and adjusting the cooling intensity based on that. My dumb fridge always freezes vegetables because even when set to lowest setting the cooling is too much.

              But corpos would rathed stuff ads everywhere instead of making actually usefull upgrades.

              • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I mean, smart fridge COULD be scanning its contents and adjusting the cooling intensity based on that.

                Looks around at where product design is usually heading

                I mean, a smart fridge COULD be scanning it’s contents and adjust the displayed ads and sold data about you based on that.

            • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              That fridge competes with a dumb fridge from a budget brand that costs 200 to 300 bucks. You can even get self-defrosting ones at that price point.

              Unlike TVs, which need to display content, fridges can work just fine when they’re just a heat pump, a thermostat, a light bulb, and an insulated box (and optionally also a fan and a heating element). The biggest technical difference between a cheap fridge today and one from the 50s is in materials and using an LED bulb.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            They could be in theory. But they are designed to bring a lot of terrible interface choices into the mix, so a basic screen where you just pick the input source and delegate the “smart” parts to something you control can end up being more comfortable.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah, fridges are simple enough that I guarantee it’s trivial to rip all the smart bits out and still have a functioning fridge. Or just buy and old one, my grandparents still have their fridge from like 1970s and it still works.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I guarantee it’s trivial to rip all the smart bits out and still have a functioning fridge

          Unfortunately, it is not. The “smart bits” are doing the job of a control board in a dumb fridge. If the tablet shits the bed, you won’t get cooling until you factory reset it and get the tablet working again.

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve never had a fridge with a control board, it’s usually just a compressor connected via a two-connection control thingy which prevents it from starting too often, and a relay that’s controlled by a thermostat. If they managed to replace that with a control board… Why?

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Just about every fridge sold (meant for residential use, in the US) in (at least) the last 10 years has a control board in it. The only exceptions are the really cheap and small top-mount fridges, and even then it is only the ones with physical knobs that might not have a control board. Anything with buttons or a display has a control board. Many appliances with knobs also have control boards (sorry to everyone buying laundry based on “it has knobs, I trust it more”).

              As for why - because they can. What are you gonna do, not own a fridge? Keep paying someone to fix an old one (or learn to fix it yourself)? Very few people will do that. Most people will bend over and pay.

              • balsoft@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Wow, fuck that. Thankfully fixing the electrics of an old fridge is really easy (as there are so few components and they are very simple); and I’ve never had issues with refrigerant leaking.

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure it works, it also uses more electricity than the rest of the electrical devices in the house combined.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you really want a row of your food disappeared when you arrange it neatly?

    • Tautvydaxx@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “I have money, please give me your most expensive/ best fridge” but in some cases the most expensive is not the best.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        These are nowhere near the most expensive fridges. They are on the higher side of the average range.

        In my experience, the people buying these fridges are low income, low tech knowledge people that got approved for (likely too much) credit.

      • pahlimur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re wealthy enough to waste a lot of money on a fridge you aren’t buying one of these abominations. Its going to be a built in like sub-zero.

        I honestly believe these fridges are not being bought in large quantities and are part of the tech bubble.

    • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Company pays a kickback to condo building
      Condo building puts one of these in every unit
      Your lease is nullified if you interfere with the ad loads

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They already have the key functions of their smart fridges tied to the tablet shoved in the door. I’ve seen multiple instances of Samsung Family Hub fridges stop cooling and the fix was a factory reset of the tablet as it was unresponsive. Absolutely fucking deplorable imo. But also means if you make an “aggressive alteration”, the fridge probably gets bricked and you are left with an expensive and smelly cabinet.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was in my local Lowes hardware and one of the Samsung fridges on display kept actively trying to connect to my Samsung phone. I must have gotten 5 or 6 notifications from the fridge letting me know I could connect.