That’s exactly what a bot would say!

Kidding. I know. You’re right.

I have seen many posts on X (Twitter) like this one, and after reading the comments, I can confirm that the latter is true. It truly seems to me that conservatives are incapable of empathy.

I’m unsure. I’m not interested in celebrities. Though I have seen some clips of her show where she has been pretty rude to her guests. Her name also appears in the Epstein files.

Have we considered the possibility of multiple shooters? The gun that killed Kirk may not necessarily have been the one that was found.

Just trying to avoid jumping to conclusions.

You don’t. If their mind is already primed to fall for this nonsense, there isn’t much you can do to help them.

I agree with your point that people should get to decide for themselves. But not if their beliefs are hurting others. Historically, religion has done more harm than good.

That’s a bit far fetched. DLSS couldn’t put ads in game because that’s not how it works. It’s more like a post processor. It can’t generate brand new content.

Plus, if Nvidia did develop that technology, gamers would riot. Not complain. Actually riot. Not to mention it would be a legal nightmare. Modifying copyrighted game content without consent would be a courtroom speedrun.

Even so. OP’s post is nonsense. When people talk about misinformation on the internet, this is what they’re talking about.

DLSS 5 is still in the testing phase. Nowhere near commercially available yet. Demos are only supposed to show direction, not the finished result. One cherry picked image is glorified ragebait at best.

“AI Slop”

I’m curious. How do people think DLSS actually works? Do y’all think the Nvidia fairy comes and sprinkles magic dust on your GPU?

Depends how you define “good”. I say if a lot of people enjoy it then yes, it’s a good show. After all, entertainment is the primary purpose.

Unfunny and unpopular are not the same thing. A show does not stay on air for 12 seasons by being unpopular and unfunny. Producing television is expensive, and networks renew shows because they are profitable and have strong audience demand. The Big Bang Theory may have been disliked in some online circles, but commercially and mainstream-wise, it was clearly a very popular show.

CBS did not keep funding 12 seasons of a money pit out of the kindness of its heart.

I once heard an analogy which is applicable in this situation.

“If people buy drugs from one dealer, and that dealer gets arrested and sent to prison, do all of their former customers just stop buying drugs?”

I agree with you. But at the same time, filming a tiktok promoting criminal activity is really stupid. Not telling people should be rule number 1.

Well em dashes existed long before AI or computers. Many humans use them in writing, so it doesn’t necessarily indicate AI was used.

Self-defense and protecting civilians are not mutually exclusive. That’s literally why the laws of war exist.

I didn’t say you supported deliberately targeting civilians.

My point was that attacking military targets inside heavily populated areas will inevitably kill civilians. That’s why civilian protection is a central principle in international humanitarian law. The rule has to apply universally.

So just to be clear, are civilians legitimate targets as long as they live in the “wrong” country?

We’re working from fundamentally different priors. I don’t think global politics reduces to a single economic contradiction. I’ll leave it there.

In realism, the opposing tendencies are expansion of one state’s power and balancing by others to preserve sovereignty. In institutionalism, it’s integration versus fragmentation. Neither requires framing global politics as capital versus labor.

Calling imperialism the principal contradiction is a theoretical commitment, not an empirical conclusion. Other schools like realism or institutionalism would identify state security competition or balance-of-power dynamics as primary.