

I think it’s not unnecessary to let you know why you’re getting downvoted.
I think it’s not unnecessary to let you know why you’re getting downvoted.
Same. It’s about 90s culture, isn’t it? I was born in the early 90s, I didn’t consciously experience a lot of 90s things. My formative years were the 00s, therefore I’m not a 90s kid.
C’est pas le premiere moimoi j’ai fait des poteaux bilingual avec.
“Memes generated by a prompted LLM” doesn’t quite have the same ring.
Quand rance_iel?
Selbstli
That sounds swiss though.
I don’t really want to argue about what is antisemitism, so I leave it at that. Just note that I find your definitions really weird and concerning.
- It is de facto. Hate speech, which the government will twist as having Nazi origins.
Didn’t say antisemitism isn’t hate speech. But hate speech is not illegal per se. Insults are, but only the insults person can press charges. And Volksverhetzung is, which you want to read up.
- There was an debate on @lemmy.dbzer0.com
That tells me everything I need to know, thanks. /s
- The second law of NetzDG (don’t know what to call it else).
“A second law, which is in an earlier stage, aims to make it easier for users to report illegal content and challenge content decisions by internet platforms.”
I agree that they don’t request themselves, but they ought to remove and report the content. What content is vague but a lot of things could easily be interpreted as hate speech by the authorities.
Again, it’s not about hate speech. A lot of hate speech isn’t punishable. NetzDG is about the punishable cases and makes it easier for users to have existing law enforced. I don’t know how that makes feddit.org a zionist instance.
“German Penal Code explicitly prohibits hate speech, defined broadly as any expression that denigrates or vilifies individuals based on attributes such as race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.”
That is incomplete. Again, read up on Volksverhetzung. And, if you want, insults (§185 StGB).
- I don’t think so. But this is what other users are claiming about @feddit.org. Hence my post.
Its not my opinion but this was my reasoning on why @feddit.org chose their instance rules and why some people are mad about it.
If you don’t agree on feddit.org being a zionist instance and can’t even defend that claim/explain others’ claims, why even make the effort instead of letting OP explain themselves? Only thing you’re doing is open up the doors for strawman arguments. Hence I end the discussion here. I see no point in continuing. Have a nice day.
I’ll keep it brief:
You have no idea how german law works and what’s the code of law. Read it up before you comment on it again. There’s https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ listing up all the legal code of Germany (federal law at least, but crime law is federal and the state equivalents are linked somewhere on that page, too). Have fun.
You are wrong on so many things, I don’t even know where to start. Just take everything you wrote, mark it wrong and then forget about it.
Took me too long to realize that a “China Shop” isn’t a place to shop chinese things.
Don’t know about the French, but in German you can’t go wrong with Selbsties.
Maybe, I don’t know. That’s why I ask.
At !ich_iel@feddit.org we call memes “Michmichs” because me = mich in German.
They’re Pedalos.
Pro tip: learning French and German nets you up to 75% better English skills.
Passend, dass die Arbeitenden alle das Seil um den Hals haben.
What is “me”/“mich”/“moi” in dutch?
Kommt auf deinen Alkoholpegel an.
Hat jetzt länger gedauert, als ich zugeben möchte, bis ich gerallt hab dass das Englisch mit deutschem Akzent und nicht Niederländisch ist.
Eh, last time I spoke french was some 15± years ago, of course I had to make some mistake.
Mais merci pour la correction, sinon on n’apprend rien.
No, this is Patrick!