How convenient this decision was supposedly made prior to the decision to unionize and is related to only financial issues.

I bet they are always discussing what studios to cut or downsize in case of “economic downturns” or “failing to meet quarterly projections” so they can’t be accused of union-busting or retaliation.

I think we need to learn more about the union movement in Canada and US. People fought and died over these rights. Companies and governments forgot unions were the agreement we made to not drag their asses out in the streets and beat their asses.

It would be good for those in power to remember this compromise, because we are getting ripe for another wave of work reform.

The idea sounds like GameSpy back in the day for multiplayer games.

Let’s Goooooooooooooo!

Thanks for the heads up. Good to know it’s a bad faith actor behind the account.

How I know you didn’t read the article or your reading comprehension is abysmal:

"DOGE failed to cut spending because most federal spending was for entitlement programs, where spending remains high due to structural reasons and policy autopilot,” CATO’s analysis continued. “Congress alone has the authority to cut these programs, so it’s unsurprising that DOGE did not reduce spending.”

The article doesn’t say DOGE is the cause of the increase of spending. It states that the purpose of DOGE was to reduce waste and cut spending, but federal government spending has gone up in 2025 from 2024.

This article is stating the obvious, to those who didn’t buy the lies Trump and Musk were selling, but backed up the assertion with financial data.

I have to correct you on your last point. It’s only because he gives away things to poor people and not just rich people that makes him a filthy socialist.

If Santa was handing out tax breaks and children to the elite, they’d put him in the Whitehouse instead of trump.

When you can’t comprehend that jury nullification is a by product of our judicial system. It can be used for bad or good - see lynchings of the jim crow era vs those helping slaves escape.

This prick is the embodiment of the fascist belief that the law has in groups that it does not bind but protects and our groups that bind but do not protect.

Which when ya boil it down is just abuser logic.

“Dont you see what you made me do?! If you just had let me cuff you, duct tape your mouth, bind your legs, and toss you in the back of my car I would never had to shot you!”

You mean Art of the TACO 🤣

Asked directly why he cut off his father’s head, Mohn told the judge he wanted to send a message: “I knew something such as a severed head would not only go viral but could lessen the violence.”

Dude is literally trying to play off CUTTING HIS OWN DAD’S HEAD OFF as a DEESCALATION of violence…

Maybe in his twisted logic it works something like, “If you resist not only will you be murdered, but I will be even more brutal and painful”.

So i guess if the choice is being kidnapped (and who knows what the hell else) and a decapitation I guess the first option is less violent… Maybe?

I dunno, but I do need to take a shower after reading* that article 🤢.

*Edited: forgot a word