Yeah I don’t measure fecal sizes from my animals usually but I feel like the cat does it near Everytime, even the rate occasion he’s constipated and can’t poop.

When he had a UTI I feel like he did it after he couldn’t pee as well.

I believe she had her past campaign staff create a company and gave them the money, with no oversight or review that I know of that she didn’t just give hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayers money to her friends for no where near that amount of work. Company supposedly was created within days before of the payout

29th, not 39th from that link you gave.

I figured the whole point was to steal that other billionaires idea, then steal a name and say I did it so give me props. (Mark Cuban, couldn’t think of his name)

Yes. That’s how things like that work. Similar to things like the playstore, or app store and such. Apple/Google/Klarna pays for the product, you pay Apple/Google/Klarna back for the product via whatever means, Mastercard, Visa etc that you attach to their store. If they don’t receive the money from you, your account goes into bad standing with Apple/Google/Klarna, not with whoever they bought the product from, because they received their payment. So if you put a stop on the payment from your bank, it will also put your account in bad standing as owing money for a product you “already received”. It’s a shit way to do things, having a middle person, but to avoid such… don’t buy things through a middleman.

Want say “Paramount plus”, buy it from Paramount, not using another service who takes it out of your bank because you gave them permissions to upon using their service.

Thousands of people run into issues because of things like this daily.

Yes, you are right. The private business they gave the money to bought it for them.

I assume because they received the payment through the private business, not directly from their bank.

They’ve been doing this shit for years. Until you charge the people doing it with treason, convict them. And sentence them to life in prison, or as Arkansas believes in the death penalty, nothing will change. Send them both to the electric chair, and poof, people will say “maybe I shouldn’t do that.”

And a lot more conservatives will say, hey wait… The death penalty might not be fair. For all the wrong reasons. The death penalty is unfair because you may have charged someone innocent with murder. Intentionally subverting a democracy is 100% to treason. No doubts.

Did you run for a position you already have to manipulate the system set up by a democratic Republic. Yes. Guilty

Yeah the variations in such should be fairly nominal comparing such a short gap of 3 years, but over time that would have effect. Like comparing the percentage of youth using data like this: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-us-population-distribution-by-age-1900-through-2060/

On average we see ~65 being the retirement age for men with some wiggle over the years, for women on the other hand that has drastically increased from 1970 till now. Which should have effected those numbers of who’s working much greater over a 50 year time period

What was wrong with it. I saw 186,000 jobs/month growth average for 2024. That’s 2,232,000 jobs. Population growth around 3.2 million.

Edit: oh I see, I put it out of per ten people in 2025 before and meant to again, lol. My bad

Yeah I was trying to show 2023 was still overly high from people going back to work. But ~7 new jobs per 10 people is decent. As on average 62-63% of our population over 16 work. So if you cut the sub 16 year olds out of the 7/10 it’s near sustainable

2025: 181,000 new jobs, 1.8 million new people.

That’s 1 job per 10 new people.

2024: 2,232,000 new jobs and 3.2 million people or 6.97 jobs per 10 new people. (Edited, I accidentally said per 1 new)

2023 saw about 3 million jobs added, and population growth of about 1.6 million people. ~1.875 jobs per new person.

2022 and 2023 were seeing rates so high I believe because we were recovering from the pandemic, but I don’t think anyone in their right mind can look at a capitalistic nation that doesn’t believe in social programs and say 1 new job per 10 people is sustainable.

I remember Mac OS X having an issue with its mail app awhile back that would create massive log files continuously that would keep generating until they filled the entire drive. You would have to boot to a recovery partition or such because the OS partition wouldn’t have enough room to expand/boot and remove them and fix the issue.

Imagine having 130 terabytes of invisible log files

Nebraska lawmakers vote to take away the peoples votes. If a a majority doesn’t matter, then their votes don’t matter. Every Nebraskan would be supporting bowing and no say apparently …

Honestly they should just “deport” every representative who defied their votes from the state and let the federal government say " you can’t remove people for disagreeing with democracy"

Edit, did you know that charging 6000% property taxes to Republicans brings down house prices better than deporting people?

Well in the U.S. a life comes out to about 10,000,000 in court on average. So if he’s caused 10,000 to die, so far, charge him 100,000,000,000. And make it payable to the people he caused harm with, with no ability to declare bankruptcy, you know… Like he supports for every 17/18 year old signing contracts to go to college.

Someone wrote down hearsay passed down through stories for years and then translated it multiple times and people argue interpretations…

And that’s going off the idea that it was true to begin with… Which most of it logically wouldn’t occur.

If you stone women for having sex out of wedlock, she didn’t get pregnant from a sky person, shes just trying to not get stoned

I’m not sure but Ron Livingston was alright in it

Slam on the brakes to assert you are a power bottom, hope for a love tap

I don’t see how an act of Congress could do it for the same legal reasons Trump can’t “nationalize” elections, and the same reason I believe the supreme Court upheld this.

The States have the right to organize how votes are performed, but no one in the U.S. has a right to vote in reality. They have a right to not be discriminated against during voting.

Let’s say Florida decided they won’t have a popular vote for president and the currently elected representatives vote on the electors.

Every person in Florida just lost their right to vote, but they did not discriminate in doing so, and it could be legal. The residents would have to be pissed at their State government for allowing such a vote to pass… But federally, it could be constitutional.

Gerrymander remapping has been deemed unconstitutional in other states specifically because they were trying to manipulate representation of certain races to change the results.

I guess they are arguing the Scouts arent educational or work. As both work and education have laws banning discrimination based on sex if they receive federal funding.

How do you see that playing out?

Subject A says, “Ron told me he committed a crime”

Subject B says “I’m suing you for divulging information that should be covered by the NDA”

It would be admitting that the statement occurred. Thus now the entire NDA is void, and those court records can be used as testimony in a criminal investigation.