

You know it’s bad when gambling is starting to hurt for business.


You know it’s bad when gambling is starting to hurt for business.


Piping hot!


All the ones I’ve been in have.


Now you’re talking!


Bathroom door too; wanna show it all off! /s


OMFG, these things (I can’t call them people) are monsters [get rid of rear-seat reminders]!


Guess his “big beautiful ballroom” won’t be Professional Grade after all.


This should help: Snopes article It’s currently rated “Mixed” as it is still in the proposal stage at this time.


It sounds like we are agreeing.
What I said above:
I say might be because it states “employed as a member of the clergy”. I’m betting they would claim “everyone who knew” was a volunteer (i.e. not “employed”).
What your post above states (I added some bold and italic for emphasis in your quote):
This is the churches defense:
Kimberly Lowe, a lawyer and crisis manager for the church, said its preachers are unpaid and therefore might not be legally required to report sexual abuse of children. Asked if she believes the preachers are mandated reporters under Minnesota law, Lowe would only say that the language of the statute is unclear.
While I agree the Propublica article states they were required reporters and that organization does pretty deep research, I was pointing out the “lawyer way of splitting hairs” in my comments. Lawyers just love to define and redefine the meanings of words; argue about context; question “what was the ‘real intent of the legislation’”; sow doubt; faine ignorance; beg forgiveness; etc ad nauseum. That’s why lawyers are hired to defend in court. Nothing against Propublica but you wouldn’t hire them to defend in court - they are after truth, in court you want a defense which is not necessarily the truth.
Please note: none of this is meant to be “against you/your comments”. Just a slightly different angle on the subject.
Best wishes to all and I hope we can get closer to making this kind of thing just an unhappy part of history.


According to this site MN mandated reporting they might be:
People who must report
Anyone who is a professional or a professional’s delegate engaged in the practice of the healing arts, social services, hospital administration, psychological or psychiatric treatment, child care, education, law enforcement, or employed as a member of the clergy.
I say might be because it states “employed as a member of the clergy”. I’m betting they would claim “everyone who knew” was a volunteer (i.e. not “employed”).
I’m a member of a Christian organized religion. I don’t think Christianity itself is to blame; PERVERSION OF CHRISTIANITY IS, but not Christinaty itself.
Any true Christian would report this (doesn’t matter if they are legally required to or not). I’m not willing to stand in front of St Peter & God on judgement day and try to defend that kind of inaction.
They should have many years in prison to work to atone for that.


You mean like this: Kristi Noem defends killing her dog - BBC.Com
I know something that is dangerous and untrainable; and it’s not the dog!
Just pay separate shipping and handling!
There’s always a catch 🎣.


Perhaps you could put it on a separate WiFi network and have your router limit what IP range it can access on your Internet connected network (leave the gateway to the Internet off that range).


Sounds like a great cause for a law suit to me (not protecting a student). And we all know how much Louisiana cares about that.


charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence
I’ll bet that has a penalty of like $1.25 total.
Back when I was in school, they would have expelled him and gave her a high five (and told her not to get caught doing it again).
Her brothers or cousins might very well pay him a visit also.


Post the photo to every social media site available - so everyone knows you are safe and secure!


All I can say is: Take my money!
How stupid of WF.
Over qualified!