You can use Google, Microsoft, Apple and co however you want, the problem is, what you use
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Had the same problem but the search engine wasn’t only switched, startpage was completely removed.
I hope, this was an exception. Glad to see an already opened issue
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Looking for Privacy-Oriented Open-Source Android Browsers6·25 days agoNo longer maitained since half a year ago. Please stop using and recommending it
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•What extensions would you absolutely recommend to someone who use Firefox?3·1 month agoDepends on the user.
For me it’s uBlock Origin, NoScript, Cookie AutoDelete and Binnen-I be gone
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Privacy-focused mobile OS /e/OS 3.0 released with tablet mode, parental control, and more1·1 month agoThey already has these but made changed (they would say enhancements) to it. Unfortunately nothing relevant was included, but we waited more than two month for an update and we got one with patch level from two month ago. That is ridiculous.
Updates are not every month like exactly the last version proofs. Unfortunately delayed security updates are the major issue when using /e/
The point was privacy. Calyx has the philosophy that sending data to Google is good so you do not appear as unusual. But they forget that you can’t be detected by Google as an unusual user if you do not connect to Google at all.
Nonsense. Lineage calls Google and is not privacy respecting. /e/ is much better in terms of privacy.
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?2·2 months agoNo it doesn’t. What is a need? It is for troll and spam and bot protection. How does the links show that there is no need for it?
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?52·2 months agoWhat an answers. Completely nonsense
WhatsApp claim to use this. They do not show their code nor did they do any kind of audit. Therefore we have to assume that there is no encryption.
Undertaker@feddit.orgto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Ironfox doesn't have privacy.resistfingerprinting set to true in about:config?0·5 months agoThey changed some basics from Mull and decided to go other ways. That’s why I’m not using thus browser
Yes, they do.
‘But it’s end to end encrypred’ 🙄