That really doesn’t appear to be what people are describing
Bla bla punk bla bla vegan bla bla FOSS nerd bla bla ska, ethics and movement enthusiast
- 0 Posts
- 39 Comments
Telegram is a social network masquerading as a messaging app, not a “secure messaging” app.
Sounds like you’re in good hands. Enjoy the ride, plenty to learn and to feel good about understanding :)
You actually have a point, the guy is openly discussing ways to harm his kids and is in all evidence not a safe person for them to be with.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
2·1 month agoIt is, see https://github.com/m4tx/curl-bash-attack
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
21·1 month agoNo, it is different, as it adds an entire layer of indirection and unknown to the mix, increasing the risk in the process.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
2·1 month agoYes, this is the correct approach from a security perspective.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
41·1 month agoPlease tell me you are not seriously equating a highly sophisticated attack line the Solarwind compromise with piping curl to bash?
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
41·1 month agoThis is a bit like saying crossing the street blindfolded while juggling chainsaws and crossing the street on a pedestrian crossing while the light is red for cars both carry risk. Sure. One’s a terrible idea though.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sneaky demonstration of the dangers of curl bashEnglish
5·1 month agoOh the example in the article is the nice version if this attack.
Checking the script as downloaded by wget or curl and then piping curl to bash is still a terrible idea, as you have no guarantee you’ll get the same script in both cases:
axx@slrpnk.netto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Here Are Your Choices for a Self-hosted eBook ServerEnglish
6·1 month agoMost people don’t know how to use ftp anymore. It’s a pretty limited protocol (and requires 2 open ports to function). It’s hard to integrate with good modern auth solutions. Probably more, that’s off the top of my head.
axx@slrpnk.netto
News@lemmy.world•Epstein files suggest acts that may amount to crimes against humanity, say UN experts
2·1 month agoSure, but the us (and Israel) don’t recognise the international court of justice, despite helping found it, so what are the chances of something coming out of that?
axx@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anna's Archive Quietly 'Releases' Millions of Spotify Tracks, Despite Legal Pushback * TorrentFreakEnglish
6·2 months agoI’m not sure you are fully aware of the Tor threat model. The exit node is not supposed to be specifically trusted.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anna's Archive Quietly 'Releases' Millions of Spotify Tracks, Despite Legal Pushback * TorrentFreakEnglish
1·2 months agoThis.
It’s factual, public, relevant info, it can and should be on Wikipedia.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anna's Archive Quietly 'Releases' Millions of Spotify Tracks, Despite Legal Pushback * TorrentFreakEnglish
2·2 months agoOf course it can’t replace it, it’s a point-in-time archive.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anna's Archive Quietly 'Releases' Millions of Spotify Tracks, Despite Legal Pushback * TorrentFreakEnglish
2·2 months agoSure but, again, the files are in a relatively low quality.
axx@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anna's Archive Quietly 'Releases' Millions of Spotify Tracks, Despite Legal Pushback * TorrentFreakEnglish
2·2 months agoIt’s got lots of great ideas (combining what’s essentially a giant git repo with bit torrent), but in practice it’s pretty slow to do anything
You assume a whole lot of thought and strategy from “the boss” :)
I dont disagree though, fundamentally.
How big is said workplace? Can you respectfully ask for an exemption? Don’t say Windows will make you miserable (it makes everyone miserable, apart from a few Microsoft bootlickers), talk about loss of productivity, reduced security and increased risk, and – if you can – challenge the grounds on which the change is being made.
Often, they are incapable of providing proper justification for the change. May not help, but you’ll have the minor satisfaction of knowing it is bullshit.



It’s like you didn’t read the message and understand the context.