If a majority is in favor of sizably reducing a voting populace by introducing measures that will inordinately affect lower socioeconomic classes, I think I would call opposing such an action democratic. I would call the other a trait of fascism.

Being a majority opinion doesn’t automatically entitle something to be democratic. Restricting voting is automatically undemocratic.

You are an enemy of democracy and should be regarded as such if you truly believe what you’re espousing. No voter should be disenfranchised based on a lie.

A majority thinking something should be done doesn’t make it a good idea.

It would be reasonable if there were documented, regular, and widespread instances of fraud involving non citizens voting. There are not.

Portraying it as unreasonable is saying you are okay with disenfranchising millions of disproportionately poor and minority voters because you are scared of a literal fantasy. Which is to say, you’re being ignorant either willfully or not.

I’d love for a single source here lmao

Maybe don’t do things to ruin your reputation if you’re worried about your reputation being ruined?

Which is why all of these events are “once in a hundred year” occurrences all happening at the same time and for not the first time this year, let alone the past 5.

Because an inherent distrust of experts leads to a reduction in expertise which leads to imbeciles being surprised their ideas don’t actually work in the real world.

You are wrong.

…if you are legally allowed to ride a bike in a road and you are hit by someone for doing that, then that person is still legally responsible for hitting you.

Like. Did you even watch the video? What part of what happened appeared inevitable to you?

You can keep denying what you’re saying. But it’s clear that only one of us actually understands the weight of what is actually being expressed.

Because that’s what you’re saying. What did HE expect bringing a gun to a protest?

I bet you blame rape victims for being raped too.

If he was legally allowed to open carry a gun (appears to be the case), was not even holding it at the time of his first interactions with LE (per current videos, appears to be the case even if unconfirmed as of yet - it appears he was holding his phone), and was shot almost execution style (ditto), in what way is that expected? You are blaming an apparently law abiding citizen for his own death. That’s not only morally reprehensible but factually dishonest and undercutting your own alleged support at the knees.

They murdered him.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1qluz6q/another_angle_of_the_minneapolis_shooting_taken/?share_id=lskQLhDWp8R-yff1YUZNT

But wait, someone here was literally just telling me today that no one in his family is gay because he enforces good morals and that’s all you need since homosexuality isn’t scientifically real.

Lmao

No one in your family is gay that you know. There I fixed that for you. Because you’re repressing your own family.

It’s not a fucking movement. This isn’t a belief or thought process or anything. It’s who people are. You’re too wrapped up in propaganda and ignorance to see it.

David Lynch said it best: “Fix your heart or die”

deleted by creator

“The answer is not more abortion, but more compassion, responsibility, and real support for women and families.”

…which is why we’re going to throw her in prison for the rest of her life! We’re just that compassionate

Probably should have thought about that before you made the president a king

That’s not a foot, it’s 11.5 inches.

These fuckers will go watch all these Christmas movies about self sacrifice for their fellow man/spreading joy and comfort and turn around to do this.

It’s not that they haven’t figured it out. It’s that they don’t think certain people are worthy of that same treatment because they were born somewhere else.