Luckily they’ve got Sharpies for that!

At least 23 people died. As if this administration didn’t have blood all over its hands already, but they keep choosing to add to the body count

“According to the Daily Mail…”

My bs senses are tingling on this one, too. I think I’ll be watching for confirmation from elsewhere before I give this much energy.

Edit: it’s insane that it’s even remotely believable, though. And it is believable. Like, easily believable.

Can’t wait for We the People to bail out the banks again and lose our shirts along the way.

The right answer in normal times would probably be a class action, but the govt lawyer was saying they’d probably fight that, meaning it will get hung up for a long time in the courts almost certainly, meanwhile they can seemingly keep stomping on our collective rights. It was very frustrating to listen to.

I was listening to some of this exchange on NPR earlier. What strikes me is that the justices apparently can’t make a decision on the unconstitutionality of this stupid EO until a case makes it to them, when this case is obviously a part of the very same issue. I understand why, because without a check we’d be at severe risk of judicial overreach, but in this case, allowing SCOTUS to come out and say “Unconstitutional thing is unconstitutional” just seems like the normal and correct thing to do.

…and at extreme cost. This is not very DOGE-aligned at all.

Remember the button they had to keep pressing in LOST? That.

She was hired for her looks

Of course they did. This is fascism.

Insurance company denying coverage for reasons: MontgomeryBurnsTappingFingersAndGrinningEvilly.jpg

Tin soldiers and ICE is comin’

Its fine, I’m petty sure they were both implying that one could replace “despite” with “specifically because of” and it would sound just as believable given all this exile business going on