- 1 Post
- 7 Comments
onlinepersona@programming.devto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?72·2 months agoWhat are you talking about? Are you saying sealed sender is a lie? If so, I want some proof.
onlinepersona@programming.devto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?1817·2 months agoThere is a lot of FUD here. It’s just like anti-vaxxers claiming vaccines make you autistic or have microchips in them: they don’t understand what they’re talking about, have different threat models, and are paranoid.
Messages are private on signal and they cannot be connected to you through sealed sender. There have been multiple audits and even government requests for information which have returned only the phone number and last connection time.
onlinepersona@programming.devto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?282·2 months agoNothing “derailing” us. Not everyone has the same threat model. The messages are private and that’s what’s most important. Signal can only provide phone number and last connection time to the feds. If that’s too much information for you, then you’re not the target group and have a different threat model.
onlinepersona@programming.devto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?51·2 months agoAre you seeing spam on signal? Do you even know why spam is possible on phone networks and what the difference is between phone networks and the internet?
onlinepersona@programming.devto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can I ignore flatpak indefinitely?English1·4 months agoI wasn’t being very serious about
nix
. IMO, it’s quite the time investment due to its poor documentation and it has a lot of gotcha’s if you aren’t on NixOS e.g one example is that it’s great for terminal applications, but horrendous for GUI applications as it’ll be hit or miss. Again, this is if you’re not on NixOS. So, it can feel like an “all or nothing” approach.If you have the time and will, then it can be very rewarding. But if you just "want something that works ™ " side by side in your current system, personally, I wouldn’t recommend it - unless it’s hidden by some other tool like
devenv
(which is a great tool for reproducible developer environments).
onlinepersona@programming.devto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can I ignore flatpak indefinitely?English0·4 months agoAdopt
nix
and you will be able to ignore it forever! 😉Seriously though, as others have said, use whatever fits you best. I avoided snaps and flatpaks due to the increased size requirements. So many things were duplicated for no apparent benefit (to me). However, with their introduction of permissions and portals, it does seem like a safer option. Although, we’re in a phase right now where not everything is flatpakked and applications trying to talk to each other is a pain (keepassxc unable to talk to flatpak
firefoxlibrewolf, chromium, etc.).Now that I use nix, I have a whole bunch of other problems, but at least getting packages is quite low on the list.
all hail lynx