

yeah, I can see not having a social media profile at all being treated as tantamount to sedition before too long
yeah, I can see not having a social media profile at all being treated as tantamount to sedition before too long
I live in a slightly less developed country where as far as 90% of the population are concerned, Facebook is the internet.
I hate it with a passion, but if I don’t have a login then there’s no way for me to find details of pretty much any business or event in the city.
I did a ‘download all your data’ on Facebook a while back and there wasn’t anything about my tracked browser history. Does this mean they’ve also violated the “users should be able to see the data you have on them” article of the GDPR as well?
I’m guessing they’re trying to hide behind weasel shit about the ids being anonymized or something as though it wasn’t trivially easy for them to deanonymize…
The fact that there’s no buckets means that you can’t then usefully draw any further conclusions about the ratio of buckets to things. In your first two examples we can take the results and use them to work out further things like how much might the buckets weigh, what happens if we add more buckets or more things, etc.
In the divide by zero answer, we know nothing about the buckets, and the number of things becomes meaningless. But worse of all is that it’s easy to hide this from the unwary, which is why you occasionally see “proofs” online that 1=2, which rely on hiding divide-by-zero operations behind some sneaky algebra.
When we say we “can’t” divide by zero, we mean ok you can divide by zero, but you’ll get a useless answer that leaves you at a mathematical dead end. Infinity isn’t reversible, or even strictly equal to itself.
I’m amazed at how after 50 years, over 100,000 top-tier software engineers, and $3,500,000,000,000, Microsoft are still so bad at making operating systems.
It’s almost as if Capitalist rhetoric about innovation is bullshit.
I’ve got a pet theory that a hypothetical alien species’ music would be more recognizably similar to humans’ than their biology would.
There’s a certain amount of discourse in KotH fandom around exactly how all four childhood friends came to buy houses on The Alley behind Rainey Street. Apparently the canon is hazy and inconsistent, though I can’t remember the details.
🥱 Brick
☺️ Brick with built-in sling for maximum control and power
I think OP’s meme illustrates Feynman’s point very well; there comes a stage where if the number of incorrect statements in your explanation outnumber the the correct ones, it’s no longer a meaningful explanation.
Look at that young whippersnapper. I had one for my discman.
Commerce isn’t the same thing as capitalism.
All bases should be quoted in Base-1, the basedest of bases
Your life can be so much better if you get over the notion of having to own things. Almost every luxury out there can be enjoyed without having to own it, as long as you’re able to discard the consumerist propaganda that you’ve not enjoyed it properly unless you can take it home.
The giant jpeg square artefact on the side of Homer’s head in the first frame undermines the message somewhat.
I usually screenshot it in place with alt-print screen, paste it into paint, crop it to size, and save
I got into a long debate with someone who wouldn’t accept my claim that pi is 3.
My reasoning was that 3 is accurate to the number of decimal places it’s quoted to, which is all you ever can say of any given value of pi. Like, pi might not be exactly 3, but it’s not 3.14159265358979323846 either, because both values still have infinity digits missing.
Big burgers should just be two burgers
Everyone has that one moment when they realize just how expensive a good box is if you need to go out and actually buy one with money.
deleted by creator