Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year.

The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels.

But Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

“I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The moron just wants the war to hide his shenaningans at home. Sole reason. Everyone should know by now that he automatically denies any and every thing that runs contrary to his own personal narrative.

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    wasn’t YET building?

    I mean… Why do you even get the uranium enriched to such high levels if you don’t plan to make use of it?

  • Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We have done this dance before last time it cost me my 20s my sanity and most importantly a huge amount for friends I loved like brothers who died before and are still killing then selfs…

  • Englishgrinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The truth doesn’t really matter. Israel will get their war, and the US will lumber into it behind them.

    What’s crazy to me is apparently the US has become so polarized, so used to division that pointing out Israel is acting like bloodthirsty psychos is somehow supporting Iran, or Hamas before that. It’s like their whole culture has evaporated any nuance at all. Only diametrically opposed good and evil battling forever. Professional wrestling stories with Heels and Faces divided by clear black lines.

    • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Came here to say the exact same thing.

      It doesn’t matter if it is true or not (not just this topic) but if you repeat the lie enough and gaslight the public it becomes true, and if it doesn’t so what, what are you going to do about it.

      NOTHING that is what they are counting on.

      Keep up the protests, the No Kings protest was huge even if MSM is downplaying it.

  • VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 hours ago

    First, weaken the commercial aviation in your country. Second, start calling everything terrorism. Third, start yet another war in the middle east.

    Your guy is desperately looking for another 911.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s fine. Iraq didn’t have WMDs either. They just need a lie to sell it to the public.

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    In [Trump’s] view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb.

    Those are clearly Netanyahu’s words in his mouth. Netanyahu has been loudly and confidently saying that at regular intervals since 2012. Iran is always weeks away.

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    14 hours ago

    He’s an idiot who has never been able to distinguish between his fantasies and reality

    He’s spent a lifetime making shit up, and never being held to account for it

    He’s a child, and what’s worse, he has dementia.

    He also lies as easily as he breathes. Truth means nothing to him. He sees being honest as a weakness

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “But what choice do we have? Entrust the military to a lady? We’ll take the dementia-addled toddler instead”

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Didn’t matter. Look at the three elections that Trump ran, and his performance against the candidate with a penis vs. the ones without one.

            The American electorate will vote for a Black penis-haver (particularly if he is a baller) over any vagina-haver right now. They still won’t say “I’m a sexist pig” in the exit polls, though, so we get reasons like “She didn’t explain her policies enough” or “She wasnt authentic enough” instead.

            • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t flatly disagree, but I think to call Hillary or Kamala as “electable” as Obama is a hard sell. He was a better public speaker than any president in my lifetime and he played things off well. Kamala was certainly more likable than Hillary, but she didn’t have as much sauce as the sauce king at least before he was usurped by the sauce god Mamdani.

            • sunnie@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Maybe I’m just being hopeful, but I don’t think the vagina thing is as big of an influence as it seems. First, we only have a sample size of two.

              One of them, Clinton, was just an objectively awful person. She wasn’t popular with anyone, including women.

              The second, Harris, had an abbreviated campaign caused by Biden’s unwillingness to step down. She also wasn’t built up in preparation fora campaign during her VP term. On top of that, she was very unexciting policy-wise. Basically status quo when everybody is clamoring for progress.

              Contrast that with Obama, who ran on “hope and change” and got people excited for actual progress. Which he didn’t deliver, but that’s another story.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    why tf would a fascist dictator give a rat’s ass about “reasons” to plunge multiple countries into war? he wants war, that’s what’s going to happen

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        the difference is bush 1 & 2 made an effort to convince everyone their bullshit wars were justified. diaper fascist is literally saying “don’t care”

        the thing that’ll shock me is if we’re NOT at war within a month

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            not sure what you’re trying to argue. that maybe we won’t go to war?

            i didn’t say no one called them out, just that they made an effort to justify the wars.

            the wars still happened, didn’t they. despite being “called out”

            people have been “calling out” trump for decades. we still have trump. people are “calling out” this war too.

            • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              My point is this is not specific to trump. I don’t like him but this is typical American military complex which we have seen in the past. History repeats itself.

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Destabilizing Iran has been a major part of the US vision to reshape the middle east in it’s own favor, in order to retain hegemonic control and move the theater to China

                It’s also been Israel’s goal since the 1990s, and Israel is an fundamental to US foreign policy in the region