I mean the whole school I went through kept nailing in our heads how much a foreign language would benefit you. I guess this went under the noses of whoever like teaching kids to balance a checkbook.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It hasn’t really been an economic necessity or cultural priority like other countries.

    Most countries who have a population who speak more than one language usually either have a variety of languages spoken within/near the country or rely on ESL speakers to participate in the international workforce.

    With English being the current lingua franca, Americans already know the current dominant language. There is really only one major language which is relevant to neighbors, but Americans are usually in the more dominant economic position and there is a cultural aversion to adopting Spanish more.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the correct answer.

      If you live in SE Asia for example you speak your local language at home but you need to learn English for work.

      If you already speak English at home then you already know how to speak English at work.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They could, if they were economically relevant on the continent. Spanish and Portuguese are far more relevant when interfacing with international trade in the Western Hemisphere.

        I pointed out cultural reasons for maintaining a language as well. The USA, as a country, has no current cultural reason to have portions of the country maintain a different language.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Quebec isn’t Canada.

            Having to get documents translated is a cost of doing business in Canada. You don’t have to speak both languages to conduct business in Canada.

              • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                But we’re talking about economic utility. Quebec isn’t Canada; it is much smaller.

                In contrast, Mexico has a GDP near Canada as a whole and there isn’t a bilingual legal framework to support business deals. Furthermore, there are more Spanish speaking countries to make deals with in the Western Hemisphere; the closest that French has is Haiti.

                  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    But if you’re looking at an American choosing a language based on potential job opportunities, Spanish is likely going to offer far more upside than French unless that American has certain ties which would make French more relevant to them. For large parts of the USA, knowing Spanish will be more locally relevant than knowing French.

                    It isn’t saying that French is a bad language for Americans to learn, but that most of the country would likely see Spanish as more economically useful.