Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can’t

  • Ice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    One could argue that if euthanasia is legal, then there would be situations of: “Hey, granny is kinda taking too much resouces… maybe we should just pull the life support?” or “Okay my child has cancer and takes up too much of my money, and all this money would be wasted if the treatment fails, I’m gonna talk to the doctor and end this parasite once and for all”

    Which is exactly why I’m in favour of euthanasia for humans on a moral level (people should be able to decide their own fate) but against it on a societal level (it will likely result in people getting pressured into “choosing” death.)

    The harm of the people who are unable to choose death (a.k.a commit suicide) on their own suffering is a lesser evil compared to people who want to live being pressured into dying (in my view).

    • desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Right?! For example in Canada they have “MAID” (Medical Assistance in Dying) and it’s a good start but recently they tried to add mental disorders to it and it’s really itchy for me.

      • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah I got major downvotes on here once for saying MAiD for mental health problems seems ripe for abuse. Isn’t suicidal ideation a symptom of many mental health issues? And the state is just going to help people fulfil those urges rather than treating the underlying illness causing them? Seems crazy to me