• Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yup quit buying their stuff a while back. Insane prices and less product. Only a clueless idiot would think that would attract customers.

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Attempts to win back consumers through smaller package sizes and promotional deals went nowhere.

    What kind of consumer would be won over by smaller sizes? Savvy consumers know the best deals usually come from the larger sizes, which tend to have a lower price by weight. I don’t even look at the tiny bags. Or are they seriously trying to frame shrinkflation as somehow being for a customer’s benefit?

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      are they seriously trying to frame shrinkflation as somehow being for a customer’s benefit?

      In the age of MBAs, I would bet on that 9 times out of 10.

    • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah they are attempting to frame it that way. Here’d the logic in their muddled heads.

      “We’ve increased the price of a 250g pack to £2 and people have stopped buying, so we’ll reduce the price to £1.50”

      “Yeah but you reduced the size to 100g”

      “But the price !!!” Waves hands confusedly.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I used to only buy name brand snacks. I like the consistency, and I can afford it, so I’d spend the extra few cents. And honestly I just didn’t even pay attention to the price.

    But $6 for a bag of Cheetos? I can still afford that, but I won’t because fuck them. I’m buying store brand for life now. If they put the price lower than it was before and fire someone for being so disrespectful to their customers, I’ll give them another shot, but that’s not going to happen.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve not yet found a single good store brand here in Estonia.

      I have however resorted to eating significantly less of that shit and preferring Taffel (Finnish), Estrella (part of German company Intersnack) or Balsnack (Estonian) when I do.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There is a Frito-Lay factory in my home town. It absolutely stinks. At certain times of the year, it’s worse and the odor just lingers in the air.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The article doesn’t mention it, but at least here in Europe, one big issue is that they changed all their products to be tasteless.

    Because of the ‘healthy foods’ grading we have here, they took out a lot of what made their chips tasty. Resulting in very bland products. We personally haven’t bought any of those brands for a few years now because of it. Because I don’t want a ‘healthy’ chip - I want a tasty snack.

    It’s definitely noticeable in Dutch supermarkets that many people are ditching those brands because of the lack of taste. And the price increases just accelerate that.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        In the Netherlands and a few other countries we have the Nutri-Score

        https://www.rivm.nl/en/food-and-nutrition/nutri-score

        This ranks a food from A (best) to E (worst) based on how well it fits into the dietary guidelines.

        Important thing to note: it’s a ranking that compares foods in that same group. So it’s not ‘vegetables are A, pizza is E’, but rather ‘this Doritos has less salt than this bag of Lay’s’.

        Now, this effectively caused companies to make their products blander in order to avoid a worse score. It also happened to save them money - you use fewer ingredients.

        End result: chips now appear healthier because they have a better score… while also tasting like cardboard.

        And how did that go over with consumers? See article. And you can read numerous complaints about it on social media.

        Ironically, this also means that the Nutri-Score sorta works. Why eat chips when they are tasteless? 😂

        • FG_3479@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I bet it will become like the Parental Guidance symbol. People will buy products with a low Nutri-Score because that (for junk food) symbolises quality.

        • Katana314@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I remember one chef giving the very specific critique that America doesn’t add nearly enough salt to its foods. Seems that’s a very tense cultural thing.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Alright, I thought you were saying evil EU laws make our food suck but it’s actually good old corporate decisions to maximize profit. I’m Dutch as well so I know about nutriscore. I don’t see that clear line between an advisory traffic light system on packaging and Lay’s making potato chips worse than they already were. It’s up to Lay’s, don’t blame the nutriscore.

  • Pyrixas@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “We’ve spent the past year listening closely to consumers, and they’ve told us they’re feeling the strain,” said Rachel Ferdinando, CEO of PepsiCo Foods U.S. “Lowering the suggested retail price reflects our commitment to help reduce the pressure where we can. Because people shouldn’t have to choose between great taste and staying within their budget.”

    Um, you forced them to do that, you tone-deaf son of a bitch.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Because people shouldn’t have to choose between great taste and staying within their budget.

      Thankfully that doesn’t apply to PepsiCo, because 90% of their snacks are the most mid shit on that shelf coasting off brand recognition and shelf space. If I want cheap, I get generic; if I want great taste, I get some other brand. If I want somewhere in the middle, I get Utz. If I want medium–high cost for medium–low-quality flavor and texture, I buy a PepsiCo product. And if I want to make the right choice, I don’t get any of those.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The only thing keeping them afloat is pure market penetration- it’s hard to not maintain volume when you’re the only one on the shelf of every mini mart.

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My favorite chips are store brand. Whatever store. They taste better and are cheaper. This started with Blue Bell BBQ chips. Long gone, but so good.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    21 hours ago

    oh, no! looks like all that greedy shrinkflation blew up in your greedy faces! boohoo!

  • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Oh no poor people are our biggest market. How else will people in food deserts get their calories.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Like if I’m going to pay $9 Canadian for my chips anyway, I might as well buy the locally made brand or other premium chip.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If you’ve found one, do you have any leads on a Canadian brand that makes good All-Dressed chips? I’d definitely pick them on my next trip north.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        My rec is Hardbite Chips.

        • But honestly try any Canadian product you see available.
        • 0li0li@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Hardbite is the best option in Canada, no contest. The prices are quite fair too given the current market.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Oh yeah you may be right. They have a way larger presence here so my impression was it’s Canadian, let me fix that.

            Minnesotans are as about as close as you can get to a Canadian so…

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          My rec is Hardbite Chips.

          Awesome! These look like they’re available local to me only a couple miles away here on the wrong side of the border.