Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 11 months agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square64linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square64linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoPffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 months agoIt doesn’t anymore =( 5e uses diagonal = 5’
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 months agoWell anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months ago4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances. Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoAlternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 months agoOh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
Ah, D&D rules
deleted by creator
Pffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
It doesn’t anymore =(
5e uses diagonal = 5’
Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances.
Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
Alternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
Oh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares