i mean it makes sense for how our courts currently work: a combined judiciary and prosecutorial branch would break the adversarial system

the new thing here is that not from the progressive caucus but an establishment democrat:

In 2025, Larson rejected calls to step aside amidst “generational change” and concerns over his age while facing multiple serious primary challengers after suffering a complex partial seizure on the House floor in February.

For the first time since 1999, Larson faces serious Democratic challengers [for 2026].

all of those from this term were from the progressive caucus

not to mention Apple Education sells it for $500

i wonder how many “fun” pictures the AFP does have

an incredibly bizarre story that isn’t true, unless leavitt is that long-foretold slayer of the cuccoo

lol i’m not a professional guy either i’m just an enthusiast who learns things but thanks!

the agency was “made aware” that the White House did not like the photo, but stressed that the decision to remove the image was “an internal editorial one, based on our standard quality and selection criteria” and that there was no external pressure.

For what it’s worth, as an amateur photographer I agree. It’s a very weird image of Karoline Leavitt towering over a turkey and—as the oblique angle suggests—threateningly.

I didn’t say that it should be part of the OS. You’re repeating a different (compelling) argument that doesn’t change whether this field is opt-out when this entire subthread is about whether these fields are opt-out since kent_eh said the other fields were opt-out.

exactly, users should disable the optional birthDate field

Your point is true, but I’m saying its impact is also optional.

That is the purpose, but the field is implemented as optional and modifiable with admin privileges.

(same for the birthDate field)

okay!

rank and file is only a small part of the article, though? way way more is about the reasons in revenue sources, “first they came for Anthropic”, and OpenAI’s opportunism. i don’t think any previous things like “gulf of america” have caused this kind of open-letter response

that is indeed in this very article. please read the last paragraphs

sauce?

i’d say the article shares your skepticism

the article mentions that:

The rallying behind Anthropic was tinged with opportunism. Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, said in a memo to employees this week that “we have long believed that A.I. should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons,” which is the same stance as Anthropic’s.

But late Friday, after Mr. Trump had ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology, OpenAI said it had reached its own agreement with the Pentagon to provide its A.I. for classified systems. OpenAI said it had found a way to put safeguards into its technologies that would somehow prevent the systems from being used in ways that it does not want them to be.

For many A.I. companies, government contracts are only one piece of an expanding pipeline of business. The $200 million contract that Anthropic had been negotiating with the Pentagon for A.I. use in classified systems, which precipitated the fight, would most likely be only a small percentage of the company’s revenue. Anthropic primarily sells A.I. software to other businesses and last year hit a monthly pace of $8 billion to $10 billion in annual revenue, Dr. Amodei said in December.

jpeg xl has even less default support tho unless you use a mac