Not only are you doing the very same thing right now, you’re also precluding the solution to the paradox of tolerance.

In other words, get bent

I’m familiar

It’s funny because engineers are known for making simplifications like this, not because the simplification is problematic

You heard me

Yo moma begs to differ

I can confirm that this is false

This question was written by an engineer

Freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences.

You’ve absolutely lost the plot, I didn’t know that Lemmy had bots now.

How do I express anger via upvote?

The genie has the power to disagree about granting extra wishes.
The genie isn’t bound to be honest.
Why do you think that’s the only thing they can disagree on? And why do you think they’d be honest that they have to fulfill the wish to the letter? And why do you think they’d consider that all a single wish? And why do you think that they’d tell you if they didn’t?

Genies want to grant wishes that undermine the wishes intention. You don’t think they’d do that on a wish about not undermining the wish’s intention?

I disagree for the reason stated above.
A genie may also disagree for the reasons stated above.

a wish with multiple components could be considered multiple wishes, just like if you were to say “I wish for riches and the ability to fly” is two wishes.
Since you wished for “no malicious compliance” last, it wasn’t in effect when the other wishes were granted, include for the wish of no malicious compliance.

But even if you wish for it first, we already see that some wishes aren’t granted, like the wish for more wishes. And we also know that the genie isndishone because it is maliciously complying. So why do you think the genie would be honest about if it actually fulfilled the wish for no malicious compliance?

Just because you say “there shall be no malicious compliance” doesn’t make it so, right?

If the things nature isn’t to follow your orders to the letter, but to maliciously comply with your orders, then telling it not to won’t change anything.

That’s what she said

What does “adult scholastic book fair” mean?

Is it a book fair for adult shoppers?
Or a fair of adult content books?

Naw, I pronounce it like I’m Yiddish. Idky I just can’t get my tongue to do that.

To listen to the difference in how québécois and Parisian pronounce 'r’s is kinda wild

I mean, no letters are really silent, they affect the pronunciation of adjacent letters.

I’d say you don’t pronounce the ‘n’ like an ‘n’, making it silentish, and it affects the adjacent ‘o’, giving it a more gutteral sound.

Now if only I could roll an ‘r’ instead of gurgle it

Even that n is suspect. Surprise French silent letters be like

Moh-reh-aal

I try to roll my r’s.
But it always comes out like a gutteral r instead, like I’m choking on it.

Pa 💦gh💦 ee

who’s that alchemist???
ITS MAES!!!
it’s Envy!
FUCK!!!