• 1 Post
  • 12 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle





  • The OP states that the officer searched the backpack on the scene, drove it to the precinct during which time there is no footage for the 11 minutes, and THEN found the gun in the front pocket of the bag while at the precinct.

    A lot of dumb coincidences need to line up for everything to so convently work out in the police’s favor.



  • If it’s actually the gun used in the murder, it may have been found previously. It’s a disposable weapon, after all. They may have found the gun in NYC and figured they can’t tie it to anyone unless it’s conveniently found on the person they arrest.

    Now I’m not saying that IS what happened, but it very well could have happened. The circumstances behind the handling of evidence have been very suspicious and a little bit too convenient.



  • Even if he committed the crime, and kept all the evidence conveniently in his backpack

    Yeah, he conveniently carried around a disposable weapon used in a murder that he was wanted for, instead of disposing of it. Also he conveniently wrote a manifesto related to the murder and carried that around in his backpack as well.

    Nothing suspicious here. Move along.


  • Here’s the thing: they’re saying it’s him, but the evidence is poor and suspicious, and they’ve been making lots of procedural “mistakes” trying to put him away. Like way too many obvious mistakes that you just can’t afford to make in a case like this.

    Maybe he did it, maybe he just vaguely looks like a guy in a low-quality photo near the scene of the crime.

    I think there are enough issues with the entire process that I wouldn’t assume he’s definitely the guy. But he’s the face that’s been associated with the so called crime, and it gives people something to rally around.