• Aeao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            They’d live to disagree. The people you kill by driving blind wouldn’t. That survivorship biase

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            They’ll survive. Their cars might not…

            Nobody will die , so I’m not sure what you’re saying.

            • Saapas@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Rear-ending someone at highway speed is pretty fucking dangerous to everyone involved

              • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Is this the only argument?

                Because while that’s dangerous, modern safety standards in vehicles mean the probability of mortality in these situations is substantially reduced.

                My point is that people won’t die, not that it’s a good thing to do.

                • Saapas@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  People die from being rear-ended or rear-ending someone all the time though

              • Aeao@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Irs actually not dangerous in the same way driving blind is. I doubt you care about crumple Zones.

                In one situation you drive blindly into an accident… the other “well rear ending can sometimes be bad!!!”

                It never is. The you’re wrong, crazy, and also stupid.

                You’re entire argument is “driving blindly is safer than stopping blindly” it’s dumb. It’s a dumb argument. When is going ever safer than stopping lol? You are dumb.

                • Saapas@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You do realize that if you are driving blind on a highway you would probably rear-end someone, same thing you would do by slamming on the breaks lol

                • Saapas@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I can’t control the car behind me and I definitely don’t want them slamming into me

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you can’t see the road look to the right side to keep yourself in the lane or look at the double yellow line. I’m no help at avoiding the other cars in your lane but this should keep you moving forwarded instead of brake checking the person behind you

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I hate cars more than anything on this planet. And my great sorrow is that when I die, I will never have seen a car-free day in my life.

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do you camp in the wilderness? Because most people insist on bringing their car or their SUV with them.

          I make it a point to cycle to provincial parks and use rustic camp grounds, but most of these still have parking spaces. In fact, the provincial parks here literally have a disclaimer on their website to warn people that some camp sites are not accessible by car. You have to tick a box that says “I understand this camp ground is not accessible by car”.

          And if people want to go on crown/public lands where wild camping is permitted, then they’re probably gonna use a fucking car.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I camp in the wilderness. I can still hear the cars. There is no escape. You’d have to go way out into the wild to be free from noise pollution. Or other pollution. And there’s still going to be both.

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s the point. You have to traverse serious wilderness to get away from it. It used to be the normal state of the world. Now it’s all fucking smog and 24/7 engine noise. You’d have to go seriously off grid to get away from it.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I do, I do. There’s always engine noise. You can’t escape it. I can’t even imagine what life must have been like five hundred years ago. It must have been so quiet and peaceful. No cars, no radios, no tvs, no planes, not the constant droning of some kind of engine, not even lights.

          In the evenings it would be calm and quiet and dark, apart from conversation, maybe some birds chirping, the sounds of an inn cooking dinner and serving guests, the only light coming from flickering candles or torches or fires. Streets were for walking. You’d meet people, friends, enemies, children, pretty girls, and I believe it would all be fairly hushed early in the evening, because people would go to bed when it was dark and no further work could be done for the day, and men would sit huddled around campfires and drink whatever beverage they had, like wine or beer, from bottles made of glass or clay.

          Sure, there’d be some serious drawbacks to that life too, but at least their air wasn’t poison, they didn’t breathe poison.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen another “joke” like this when I was on reddit and I had to save it to remind me how most people think it’s funny to drive a multi ton lethal vehicle when they can’t see shit around them.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You saw a joke and you though “this just be what most people truly believe”?

        Can you walk me through how you reached that conclusion?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I only do it with 3 or 4 bars of signal. I wouldn’t want my livestream to cut out during such a high intensity moment.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I seriously hope OP has stopped to take that pic and didn’t just pull out the phone while driving to do this.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you think being stopped means it’s safe to use your phone behind the wheel?

            How are you supposed to make an evasive maneuver if the car behind you can’t stop? Or if someone starts crossing the road and is now laying on the road from falling?

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Move your foot from the brake to the gas and steer out of the way…? Same way you would move for emergency vehicles. Which is another reason to pay attention to the road.

                How is this even a question lmfao.

                • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Nederlands
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You’re not quickly getting your car out of the way of someone else if you’re fully stopped. Most of them don’t accelerate nearly fast enough for that. Besides, pretty sure I would just stall the car if I tried evading someone quickly while probably slightly panicked.

                  You don’t do an evasive manoeuvre for emergency vehicles. You should hear and see them coming from quite a distance. You just scoot over in a regular way.

            • Hope you aren’t using a phone to send this. Who knows what could happen during that time. Maybe someone puts the big red launch nukes button under your foot and you start nuclear winter when you go to stand up.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s obviously something that’s impossible to happen.

                If you think that neither of those are possible, or countless others… you’re a hazard on the road. There is absolutely no reason to use your phone while stopped, anything can happen, and you won’t notice while you’re sending that text.

                The life of you or someone else isn’t more important than whatever is on your phone.

                You seem to think getting rear ended while stopped at a light is an impossibility… that’s clearly not true and there’s plenty of statistics to support this is entirely possible and does happen. Now, you can also avoid the collision if you’re paying attention and have space. But obviously that can’t happen if you’re too preoccupied with your phone, instead of the road. Like you’re supposed to. At all times.

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re still driving a car while stopped mate. This is the reasoning that leads to people drinking while they are stopped. They aren’t technically driving… but it’s obviously not safe and shouldn’t be done.

      Yet people condone it? Fucking hell.

  • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Clean your windshield, inside and out, and polarized sunglasses, or sunglass clips for glasses. And make sure any level of astigmatism you may have is known and corrected for.

    If after washing your windshield, it still scatters the incoming light too much, it is probably pitted. You may have to consider replacing it. It is part of maintaining a vehicle. It may suck to be surprised with an expense like that, but the surprise expense of an avoidable accident is much worse. And might not only be expensive.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Clean your windshield, inside and out,

      Five minutes on a road that gets salted in the winter, and the windshield will be covered in a thin crust left behind by the brine spray from other vehicles. End result is that things will be just as bad when the sun hits you straight on.

      Polarized glasses, as you mention, do help, as well as putting down the visor so you don’t stare directly into the sun.

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s why it’s really important to have enough windshield washer fluid (rated down to whatever cold temperature you might encounter). Just gotta run that once every few minutes.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you are catching spray, try to increase the follow distance between you and the vehicle ahead. Same deal for rocks in places where that is a concern. It can be hard to leave a big gap, for fear that someone will come into that gap, but you can’t fix everyone, you can only fix you.

        But, we also do have wipers for anything that happens during the current drive, not as good as not getting dirty in the first place, but better than staying dirty.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If there’s a lot of traffic then increasing the distance every time someone fills in the gap, you’ll soon be standing still hah. Not every issue can be fixed, just gotta wash it with windshield wiper fluid often

              • Aeao@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You know you are arguing a lot about your right to drive blind. You might be a narcissist. You are arguing very clearly that if you hurt someone while driving blind it’s their fault.

                Maybe you are just incapable of empathy. If you kill people bit you get to your destination quicker… that’s a Win.

                Maybe you just suck?

                Let me ask you this

                You’ll get 1 million dollars but a new born infant will be skinned alive… do you take the money?

    • Deacon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Every so often I have moments like this where I encounter actual adults out in the wild and am reminded that I am just masquerading, and poorly.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We all learn from each other bro. You’re doing great, just for the fact you can recognize good advice. We are all imposters. Keep plugging.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I am an autistic 41 year old man that lives in my parents basement. I just collect information and re-distribute it where it is needed.

        I am basically the pre-cursor to an LLM, an LLM made of meat.

        If you’ve ever watched or read anything with that “wise old hermit” that people line up to ask their philosophical questions to. That was an oldendays autistic person of the same type as me. Can’t function in society, but has no emotional thinking to cloud their logic. The thing is, no matter how logical the advice was, and how much it made sense in the moment, it may not have been applicable to normal people. Though I am of course aware of the nature and source of my clarity and try to keep it in mind when giving advice. Unlike the wise hermits of old.

        Not to say I am always right, and not to say logic is always the correct solution. But it often is, and I often am.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No no no just because we know the grown up thing to do doesnt mean it happens. It means we grumble about “getting around to it” and dont.

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I recently found a new shower cleaner that actually works for the first time, and it cleaned the heavy deposits from my weird local water on my tub in less than five minutes, which normally takes me half and hour or more of scrubbing.

        I felt like a superior adult, started sharing the news with all of my fellow grown up children. Maybe some day I’ll identify a funny noise in my car as well and earn my real adult degree.

    • FoxyFerengi@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I used to avoid driving at certain times of day because I thought my astigmatism was making it too difficult to see. Turns out it was my windshield! Cost about $400 to to replace

    • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Eh if it was pitted you’d probably see the light shining the pock marks even when dirty. This just looks like OP hasn’t cleaned the inside of their windshield in a while.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was general advice for the situation, not specific to the image. There are many things that can cause it to be much more difficult to see when driving towards a low sun than it actually needs to be. It’s not a great situation at it’s best, but it shouldn’t be fully debilitating.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Though I’d add on to that that cleaning glass can be difficult to do right. You need to clean/rinse it properly, otherwise whatever is left over will dry into streaks, which catch light like this.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hehe, yeah. In the oldendays there was newspaper as an option for drying glass streak-free. It was never the best choice luckily, but it used to be prevalent. A squeegee was the old better solution, and a microfiber cloth is the new better solution.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    you put on the hazard lights and slow down while steering to the side of the road to assess the situation or until you can see again.

    like holy shit why would you even consider accelerating when you can’t see where you’re going