The move comes amid outcry from Democrats after the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts affixed Trump’s name to its sign in Washington.

Donald Trump’s name is being attached to a new class of U.S. battleships that will have nuclear capabilities.

Making the announcement at an event at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Navy Secretary John Phelan referred to the warships as “Trump-class battleships" and said a forthcoming vessel dubbed the USS Defiant will be “the largest, deadliest and most versatile and best-looking warship anywhere on the world’s oceans.”

Trump’s eponymous battleships will be armed with guns and missiles, as well as hypersonic weapons, electronic rail guns and high-powered lasers.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the rare case where I don’t actually disagree. Then again, I think he’d do this narcissistic nonsense even if people didn’t care about Epstein. Creating petty distractions is just a habit for him, and it has always served him well.

  • SavinDWhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The new vessels, which the president calls battleships, will be the latest in what the White House envisions as a Golden Fleet.

    golden ship

    Dunno. They’re quite easy to spot, aren’t they?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That battleship appears to have no large guns, a stealthy hull, a helicopter platform, and I doubt armor, given the superstructure.

    This kind of comes off to me like some of Japan’s “destroyers”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izumo-class_destroyer

    1000009337

    I’m wondering if what happened here is that the Navy wanted a cruiser and Trump wanted more honors.

    EDIT: I’d also add that tradition is almost always to name the class after the lead ship, but the “Trump class”, assuming the artist rendition there is of the lead ship, appears to be of a USS Defiant, not the USS Donald J. Trump. Not that I’m complaining — I’ve long prefered the old British Navy style use of names like HMS Invincible or HMS Glorious or whatnot stuff. The USS Enterprise for the US, etc.

    EDIT2: Apparently, based on other articles, the hull classification symbol is “BBG”, which has never been used, but would theoretically refer to a guided missile battleship, so it could have a bunch of VLS cells for armament. I’m a little hazy on what would distinguish it from a guided missile cruiser (CG), though.

    • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Navy wanted a cruiser

      That might be a good guess, perhaps two or three nuclear powered cruisers, fitted out for drone and anti drone work. Trumps gone and hijacked that.

      I understand the Burkes were supposed to pick up the role the Ticonderoga class played, weren’t they?

    • Geobloke@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They could be talking about an arsenal ship? Basically a battleship size missile carrier with loads of VLS cells

      I think the US navy did study the concept, but found that it was more survivable to spread those cells across more ships than to concentrate them in larger hulls

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      See, this is more of my beef with the system - battleships have been named after states almost exclusively. If he wants a ship named for himself it should be a CVN.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dude, I was literally thinking this a couple weeks ago, Trump bringing back battleships is completely on brand for him and I’m surprised honestly it took him this long

  • DSN9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Mega projects, no less with vanity as the centerpieces are a sign of weak militaries. The strong militaries are pursuing drone and anti drone technologies. Russian frigates warships are disabled by small Ukrainian aqua drones; and are hiding at port. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Here I am thinking how this will play out once MAGA ends. How was it in Germany after the war? I bet there used to be Hitler and Himmler Streets etc.

  • lemmylump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Our military needs to start pushing back, international pressure of war crimes needs to be loud.