I don’t believe any of this narrative. Its an orchestrated story and pictures. Like a false flag event on their marriage? Does it make it easier for her and cory to get married so they can’t testify against each other?
Nice distraction. But isn’t the real issue murdering americans then calling them terrorists to justify it? Or forcibly deporting tons of people with no due process?
No, the problem is her husband dressed up with fake tits.
Is she going to shoot him because she couldn’t train him? Or does she only do that to dogs?
100% she’s involved in the fetish. She’s just embarrassed she got caught.
You’re assuming they even remotely like each other. Based on how they treat other people I think you can easily put this in question.
I dont know why I should care about this. Is this supposed to be politics?
This is the party accusing drag Queens of pedophilia. They decided to make this politics instead of real issues in society.
So they’re accepting drag queens into the fold? I’m suprised.
Okay, I see.
If you look at the pictures he’s clearly dressed as Kristi Gnome
and no link to the actual report itself
what shit journalism
Blindsided please. That’s was the agreement that let her screw Corey in taxpayer paid aircraft. She’s blindsided that now everyone knows.
“The family was blindsided by this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time,” Kristi Noem’s representatives reacted in a statement to The New York Post.
Fuck that noise.
Privacy for the ghoul in charge of ripping people from their homes in the middle of the night? Fuck you.
Prayers for what? To have God help them stop being shitty and hypocritical? Fuck you again.
I love how they treat a family member being outed as a cross dresser like a death in the family. That so tracks.
That’s the kind of society they’re actively trying to achieve.
I’ll pray for them, but they won’t like it if my prayers are answered
Ah yes, the imprecatory Psalms.
Why? I’m praying for them right now. Praying that they get double cancer.
Heh. Double cancer, not just cancer … but double!
No, I think I get it now. This is the excuse she will use to jettison the husband, and spend more time with her boy toy
Honestly, this guy could have a fetish as a cuck too. That would make a lot of sense. No shame for that, but plenty of shame for telling other people that they’re evil for enjoying what they like.
Just send little figurines of the puppy she murdered, with prayers for it.
"I don’t give a fuck who they’re screwing in private
I wanna know who they’re screwing in public"
This bitch puts children in cages. Ridicule and shame her and her family for hypocrisy all you want, it’s well deserved, but the fact that this even matters is pretty wild.
The only acceptable target for bullying is MAGA. Open season.
Lots of other verbs, too
Absolutely. It’s no mystery that in a Venn diagram they are nearly a circle.
So this is the drag queen we were supposed to be worried about?
I wish my local movie theatre had this level of projection.
It’s called iMax, no?
How was she supposed to keep track of what happens in her own home while she was jetsetting around on her fuck plane with her subordinate?
Does Lewandowski really count as her subordinate if he was the one who was running the show the whole time? all she really did was get her hair done, shoot ads for her YouTube channel, and get fucked in the back of a private jet. And then later in front of Congress.
It’s a sham marriage anyway, she’s with lewandowski, quite publicly. Her mar a lago face will turn him off soon now that she’s out of power, yuck. Yuck, yuck, yuck. She looked better before the surgery, and now she has to take her face off and put it in a jar of adrenochrome every night. Fucking puppy murdering bitch, go to hell.
These fucking people… It’s literally all projection, always.
The party of “traditional family values,” everyone. If we manage to hold anything even remotely resembling free and fair elections in the future, the first order of business afterwards will need to be replacing all upholstery any of them have touched.
Cross dressing is now illegal in Ohio. In a bill that is vaguely worded and will be enforced very subjectively because nature didn’t clarify what clothes are masculine and feminine
so…who can wear socks?
Unconstitutional in truth. Freedom of speech and expression.
Things are bad; I’m not going to argue that things aren’t bad. I’m not a lawyer, I eat crayons.
That Ohio bill hasn’t been passed yet. I don’t know how likely it is to pass. Too likely, I guess.
It also doesn’t dictate a blanket ban on cross-dressing. What it does do is put “performers or entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performer’s or entertainer’s biological sex” into the category of adult entertainments like stripping, meaning it’s restricted in the same ways. No kids allowed. That’s lines 153 to 165 here.
That’s very big, it’s very bad, it’s very stupid, it’s mean, it’s anti-freedom. Un-American, I’d say. It would seem to create problems with Bugs Bunny, Harpo Marx, Monty Python, etc. But the most obvious thing it’s targeting is “Drag Queen Story Hour.”
But it isn’t a ban on cross-dressing in general. Yet.
Edit: If you live in Ohio, you can find and contact your state Senator regarding House Bill 249, the “Indecent Exposure Modernization Act,” through this page.
What color crayon is your favorite?
The red ones taste like my favorite glue.
the green ones slide further up my nose.
I’d be fine with it as long as they include the church.
A small sacrifice for the greater good.
How are they defining performer or entertainer?
Walking in public
I don’t see a definition in the bill. I don’t know if there’s a standard legal definition for that or not.
Even a good-faith interpretation of “performer” could leave some gray areas, I’d think. A song-and-dance number for an audience gathered for the purpose is a performance with a performer, sure. What about an appearance on a talk show, an interview, a forum discussion, a podcast?
Unfortunately, “performance” is a bit of jargon for a specific, unrelated concept in contract law.
The reservations your question suggests are very reasonable. I don’t intend to dampen anyone’s alarm at this absurd effort to implement legal, systemic bullying over nothing. I just so happened to be reading about the Ohio bill shortly before I came across FreshParsnip’s comment.
Nothing wrong with crossdressing. Though it sounds like he sent some of the pictures to others without consent which is much more of a problem of course (harassment)
But if he wants to dress up as a girl, why not.
He didn’t dress up as a girl. He dressed up as a man, with giant knockers.
Yes true, I saw the actual pics after. It looks less like a real crossdresser to me and rather like a sophomoric joke that leaked.
I made that point elsewhere in the thread but I hadn’t seen the pic when I made the above comment.
