Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can’t

        • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Just because its bigoted in one context doesn’t mean its bigoted in every context. Here’s an alternative contextual framing for you: “this is delusional” is also what sane people say to people experiencing delusions (such as, eg, the delusion that you are an animal, or that you are Jesus, or whatever)

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            The current context is that a layperson with no credentials or experience in psychopathology is handing out medical advice and being a bit of a jerk about it.

            • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              If someone said “I am literally God” would you need to be a trained psychiatrist to identify that as a delusion? You would not. Same goes here.

              • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Your reducto ad absurdum has no effect because I respect divinekin and think their identities as deities are valid. It’s kind of a terrible argument because you haven’t explained what’s supposedly wrong about any of these identities, you’ve just pointed at them and gone “LOOK AT THAT! IT’S WEIRD!” and expected Me to agree with you. Pretty weak strategy tbh.

                • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I’m not saying it’s weird. Im saying it’s delusional. I’m also not trying to be super rude or dismissive here, I’m just not trying to affirm any delusions, because that can be dangerous (see, for example, ChatGTP, and how its tendency to validate everything someone says can cause a mental health crisis in some users).

                  Here’s my thinking: but you agree that you are biologically not an animal. And you must agree that you have the mind of a human (we are conversing in a human language, and using the internet, which requires abstract human reasoning to do). And you have the body of a human (you seem to admit as much). So there’s a human mind in a human body. So what’s left? Isn’t that enough to make you demonstrably human?

                  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    Denying someone’s identity can also be very dangerous, because it can cause social identity dysphoria. I wasn’t taking the piss when I drew a simile between otherkin and trans people, I was being serious. If you manage to succeed in talking an otherkin out of their identity (which would make it by definition not a delusion, because delusions are beliefs not changed by evidence) all you would accomplish is worsening their emotional state and exacerbating any dysphoria-related mental conditions such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts.