So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Slightly over dramatized. This happens basically every month or so. They break it, we fix it. For me newpipe and yt-dlp havent even stopped working despite not updating anything.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m relieved because I saw this post and assumed it meant in a more serious way than normal.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    invidious, yt-dlp, and freetube have broken so many times for me over the last 6 months, I’ve fallen out of the habit of using YT lately anyway.

    It sucks because there is content there that I want but I’m not going to whore myself for it.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m on iOS so my options are rather limited, but I’ve had decent luck using Brave. Is there anything that the others do that a browser wouldn’t?

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think Brave has any special magic that other browsers don’t.

        My understanding is, all the workarounds in use recently work or fail depending on the IP address you have.

        I don’t know anything about this change but it seems to simply require a JS engine in your client. Any browser has that, so the browser addons probably aren’t effected by this change.

        However, it’s clear that YT is waging an incremental campaign here. Today it’s yt-dlp, next week… who knows.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Again, I think it’s mostly because it’s iOS - but Brave seems to be the only browser that allows both Picture-in-Picture and background play while also blocking ads.

          Both Safari and Firefox display ads, and struggle with PiP.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Reminds me of when people say “product” instead of “shampoo” or “conditioner” or whatever it is they’re actually putting in their hair. Capitalism-coded language.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you! Ffs, I was just sitting here thinking, I am not paying ticketmaster a damn dime, even if I have to miss my childhood heroes before they die. People whore themselves out and it fucks all of society constantly. Can’t watch videos because of content monopoly, can’t see a concert without getting fucked on exorbitant fees, can’t go to the hospital because holy fuck, can’t go to school without crippling debt, can’t watch TV without supporting terrorists, etc. Like bloody hell the corpos have monopolized and ruined everything. They can go to hell. I’ll play my shitty guitar, sing to myself, do home surgery, and go outside or stare at a wall. Fuck this shit!

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You still have alternative platforms to Big Tech though, PeerTube and Odysee like have been mentioned umpteen times in this thread and on Lemmy at large, and not to mention Lemmy itself, and Mastodon, Pixelfed, and Bsky among others.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure but they don’t have the content and don’t have staying power. If peertube became popular who is going to pay for the bandwidth.

          • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Its users, in part because it uses web torrent which means the traffic of videos is shared peer-to-peer, thus the host doesn’t have to pay for a lot of bandwidth.

            Also, just like mastodon servers are paid by its users for service I’m sure admins that build up a good reputation with their users or make them aware that they need more to pay for it will pay, or not and they’ll just disappear which is really how the web should work, not all these tech oligarchs who have lots of money from exploiting their users and workers.

            Edit: Was incorrect, it uses HLS with P2P support:

            At the beginning of PeerTube, we only supported Web Video (previously known as “WebTorrent”) streaming. Due to several limitations of the Web Video system, we had to add HLS with P2P support.

            • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I thought PeerTube ditched WebTorrent and switched full-time to WebRTC a while back.

              • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Seems you are correct, I thought webtorent was the only way to have peer-to-peer video, but seems not:

                At the beginning of PeerTube, we only supported Web Video (previously known as “WebTorrent”) streaming. Due to several limitations of the Web Video system, we had to add HLS with P2P support.

                That’s pretty cool, thanks for the information!

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m not an expert on these things but I just don’t like the idea of web torrent.

              I do however, whole heartedly agree that video producers should pay for their own bandwidth, and be supported by users.

                • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  IDK really.

                  I don’t dislike it in a “this is terrible technology and no one should be doing it” kind of a way. Just in a “I feel a bit icky about this” kind of way.

                  There must be privacy considerations right? Do I really want everyone to know what videos I’m watching?

                  Also, do I really want my client to be providing n upstream connections grinding away at my battery?

                  They’ve probably long since solved this I guess but in the early days firefox wasn’t supported ?

                  I just… don’t feel like this is the solution to the cost of delivering content.

          • NKBTN@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re probably right, but I’m not sure what the grift IS. Presumably they’ll start rolling out ads at some point?

            • 0xtero@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              They’re still running on VC money so it’ll be a while. My guess: ads, selling user data, AI training on user behaviours, limiting what content is suitable (getting rid of NSFW), promoting corporate brands (so algorithmic advertising) and adding crypto in one way or another. And all the other tricks that older platforms have been doing.

              And probably burying the thought of distributed protocol, hoping people will stop talking about it.

              • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                ATProto’s dual-licensed under MIT and Apache so it’s not like it’ll be easy to get rid of.

      • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I whore myself out and pay for the family plan, but I have a good reason.

        My dad watches YT almost exclusively so I told him if he shared his password with me I can add him to my plan so he doesn’t see any ads. He fell for it. Now I login into his account ever so often and mark “not interested” on any red pill bullshit I see. It seems to be working.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been trying to maintain Invidious for months, eventually google blocks my IP or ASN which leaves me troubleshooting for hours until the realization settles in.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, if you can display it on your screen, there must be a way to also save it.

    • other_cat@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Android only? Desktop client stopped working last night. Did you do anything special?

      • pfr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah Android. Desktop client (Linux flatpak) was working late into the night too. I haven’t checked again today though… will test when I get home from work

  • fedislug@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    God damn it Google. Moves like this are such an insult to the free and open net that made YouTube popular in the first place

    • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I applaud your belief that Google isn’t 100% against a free and open internet these days. They know exactly what they are doing.

      • fedislug@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh I know they are! Trying to de-google as much as possible. I was alluding to before their acquisition of the site which, even at the time, we all knew was not going to end well.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s probably more about control than security. Mandate JS, force people to watch their shit on their proprietary front-end.

      I bet ad blockers and even manually blocking related cookies in FF browsers are probably going to break the site and force Chromium browser use too.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same here (USA). I haven’t updated my newpipe in a month at least, so it simply never broke. Not a big fan of these unverified headlines.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        People love the drama. Our planet is basically a giant baboon rock floating through space. :)

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I just downloaded MKBHD’s iPhone Air review, and it played perfectly. 1920p whatever that means (somewhere north of 1440p but not quite 2160p… or 2160p/4K but slightly letterboxed). AV1 (Ay-Vee-Wun, not Ay-Vee-Eye), 30fps… looks and sounds great.

    Glad to see the community fixed it fast.

    I use jdownloader2 which probably uses yt-dl on the back end. But it also downloads from a metric fuckton of other sites, too. It’s like the Swiss Army knife of downloaders. And it’s Java, so it runs just as well on my Mac as it did on Windows back when I used that. (Wish they had an official dark theme that was easy to set up though. I know how to do it manually but can’t be arsed.)

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    As of today at least, I can still download video/audio from YT on my android phone with NewPipe…