https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not american, does this committee actually hold the power to release them or is this just a recommendation/symbolic? If rule of law is followed (I know big if) does this guarantee the release or are there still hurdles?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Me neither. It’s the house oversight committee. So it’s my understanding they do have some real power. Though to be honest I don’t know what the scope is.

      • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Everybody wants it to catch the tire, but everyone except the dog knows the outcome. Every time.

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      nah, opportunistic as ever. Main goal here is to stick it to republicans not some “principles”

        • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          high horse? Hardly. Not having principles and being opportunistic is how they lost last election. Sitting on their hands all this time approving republican bills is a confirmation to that. Epstein has ZERO impact on average worker at this point. Yes criminals have to be in jail and human trafficking is a disgust. However this will affect lives of hundreds while millions are still not protected and Democrats have no intent of protecting working class. Biden flirted with more pro-worker stance and with Haris things were back to status quo. So no, my friend no high horse, just looking realistically.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can’t we just celebrate a win for once without saying they’re not doing enough? This is a good thing any way you look at it.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think it’s hard to take the DNC seriously when they still let Chuck Shumer drone people to sleep, I mean, speak for the party.

          They’ve snubbed their own party’s progressive caucus for brain dead geriatrics.

          Their leadership has blatantly benefited from insider trading and social welfare while failing to achieve those policies for their constituents.

          Every day the DNC looks more and more like a broken clock that’s only only right when it’s 2 minutes to midnight.

          They really, really, don’t deserve applause at this point. They deserve to be replaced.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          We should celebrate the win for sure! But calling it “spine growth” is delusional, wishful thinking.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ya DNC just wants to return to Bush era GOP. This MAGA shit isn’t economically sustainable for their owners.

        • lennee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          that aint happenin, the loyalty trump demands of his ppl is a double edged sword, if he goes under they go with him. Some second grade ppl will try to cling onto by pretending trump was never the driving force but they are doomed to fail. If trump goes under the reps are done for for a while.

          • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            GOP are either dumb enough to try or just smart enough to know it’s their only option. While I agree with your assessment of the facts I still think the GOP is trying to have its cake and eat it to with regards to getting rid of trump while keeping his base.

            If they can walk this tightrope until ICE finishes establishing themselves as the national gestapo… they might be able to keep the MAGA train rolling after trump kicks the bucket.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            If trump goes under the reps are done for for a while.

            Please stop this wishful thinking. I’ve been hearing this shit for over 4 decades! Oh just wait till Regan is gone! Oh after Bush they are done! Oh after two illegal wars they are done! Oh after Trump 1 they are done for sure! Oh after the pandemic they are done! Oh after the old go away they are done! Now we’re back to oh after Trump goes away they are done.

            These morons are NOT going away. They will vote in lockstep with whatever asshole the GOP produces next and mark my words after Trump worse is coming, because with the GOP it always gets worse.

      • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        They think the Epstein thing might actually stick this time. They’re trying to use that as best they can. Any party would do that

        It might be a strong move for once though. Time will tell.

        • HuskerNation@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m going to ask a honest question because I don’t know the answer. If Trump’s name is on the list, why didn’t Dems release it when Biden was in office? Yes I know that’s a question the right has been asking but I don’t know the answer to it.

          Because I don’t care who’s on the list, Republican or Dem. They all deserve prison

          • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Not sure if Biden/dems have given a reason yet. I believe, typically, the official reason they keep this files secret is they may still intend to take legal action in the future.

            Unofficially, Biden’s AG Merrick Garland really did not go hard against Trump. They let him get away with an attempted coup, not sure if that was at Biden’s request or if Garland persuaded him not to.

            Farfetched theory on my part but Biden really tried not to stir the waters, I feel, to avoid a civil war.

            • madcaesar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              My cynical ass thinks Biden didn’t want to set precedence that the rich / president can be held accountable. He naively thought Trump is done anyway, let’s just go back to the status quo and not bother with real consequences for the rich.

          • mkwt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago
            1. Trump’s in the files, but they probably don’t have the stuff from the wildest conspiracy theories. So there’s going to be a let down no matter what.
            2. There’s a lot of victims in those files who deserve some protection and privacy. Redactions take a lot of manpower, as we’ve seen with this 1000 agent effort. That manpower could be spent on going after live criminals.
            3. Dems in the files too.
          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Because Biden respected the law. The Epstein files were sealed by a judge until after Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of this year. Biden, by law, couldn’t release the files.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Apparently it was under seal by the courts while Ghilaine was on trial, and only became unsealed in Biden’s literal last week in the presidency. And he was trying to do a bunch of things at that time, especially with Ukraine and Israel.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Along with what Salty said, it also almost certainly implicates some of the DNC’s donor class. At this point, it’s too big of a win to not go with it and too big of a loss to go against it though. I don’t know if there’s any amount of money that could get the majority of Democrat representatives to stick their necks out and go against it.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Only if we keep disciplining them. Which is why it is important to say this is a good thing but keeping their current leadership is a bad thing, both in regards to accountability.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      More pacifying, look how happy everyone is that we scored a major upset… In my opinion, they’re going to Mueller Report this and attempt to sweep it under the rug just like they did the Russian Collusion.

            • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Did you hand-stuff all those cats, too? It’s that why they’re arranged in chronological order? To demonstrate your skill progress in the pastime? Just curious.

              • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                What is this, the Spanish Inquisition? Can’t a guy engage in some casual taxidermy without getting the third degree?

                • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I mean, clearly if the Inquisition were involved, that would be a surprise for everyone, but especially them.

                  Had you found this hobby in their era and locality, you actually might’ve contributed to the onset of The Black Plague, simply by killing cats to feed your need talent.

                  Good thing you’re a late boomer?🤘🏼

    • Ruxias@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Can you help me understand Motion #2 by Mace? I was lead to believe that “credible” wording didn’t stick, but it sounds like you’re saying it actually did? If so, then yeah it leaves a lot open to being left out of the subpoena on that one word alone.

      • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hey, you’re right! That amendment got struck down! With all the back-and-forth in that video I must have lost track. Good check, thanks!

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    When he was the only person to say no, and then claimed “the noes have it,” that was the funniest gd thing I’ve seen all day. Hahahahahaha!

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    3 Republicans: “I might be a racist, zionist(somehow), corrupt piece of shit that sits down when my fellow Americans are put into concentration camps, who is all for authoritarianism and white nationalism,… but I ain’t no pederass protector!”

    a what, Walter?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just bottom rung people looking down on the only people left categorically worse than them.

      That’s why “chomos” need to be protected in jail.

      That’s why wanna be Chris Hansen’s are usually as creepy as the creeps they catch.

      That’s why violence posted online gets a free pass when its framed as a pedo getting btfu.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    A House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the Department of Justice to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

    The motion passed by a vote of 8-2. Notably, three GOP lawmakers – Reps. Nancy Mace, Scott Perry and Brian Jack – joined with Democrats on the subcommittee to approve the subpoena, defying Republican leadership.

    House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer must sign the subpoena before it can be officially issued, per committee rules. Comer plans to sign off on the subpoena, a Republican committee source told ABC News.

    The top Democrat on the subcommittee, Rep. Summer Lee, initially offered the motion.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can someone explain to this non-american why the Democrats are treating this as a successful upset when they could have released the Epstein files during Biden?

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Shhh! Don’t ruin it for the rest of us! On tomorrow’s episode of “As The Empire Crumbles”, will the files lead to anything actionable?

    • Dearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Attorney general under Biden, Merrick Garland, is a by the book liberal conservative. He assumed the treasonous actions of January 6 2021 would sink trump’s political career. He also believed - correctly- that the attorney general is appointed by a president to lead the judicial branch independent of the executive branch. Merrick focused the AG office on the January 6th investigation and didn’t publish the Epstein documents as they weren’t part of any specific case.

      There is also the theory that high ranking establishment Democrats are on the Epstein list. We also know that there are many pictures of epstein’s clients with underage girls that haven’t been published. Likely because American legal culture always seeks to punish the women involved in sex work and views the “johns” as victims who need to be protected

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Politik-brained Canadian here:

      IIRC they didn’t raid Epstein till 2019. In 2020 Democrats had a narrow majority in the house which they would lose in 2022.

      Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

      It kind of seemed inevitable that the Epstein files would get leaked or released eventually. That is until Trump officially ran again in 2023; creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently if he won.

      • Alloi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        just to tie on to this, theres a none zero chance some prominent democrat “old guard” are also on the list, and their positions are too valuable to be lost (to the status quo). january 6th, if it was enough, would have been a great way to protect the old guard and get rid of trump. but thats evidently not what happened.

        i dont care whos on the list, from what side, i want them all punished. anybody whos complicit in the current shit show, or is on that list, needs to be shot in the street like a rabid dog.

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          While I was still on Reddit, there was a list going around of politicians charged with child sex offences. Sure, there were a few Dems, curse them to hell, but by FAR the majority were Republikkklans. The list was up to page 57 last time I sighted it.

        • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          We just need the files. I’m sure there’s gonna be plenty of “I was just on it because he was blackmailing me” or whatever, from everyone involved, innocent or not. Unless there’s something that literally has itemized “X person, 2 kids, diddled both, camera footage timestamp x:xx:xx” I really doubt much legally will come from it.

          Court of public opinion however, that’s gonna cause some real shakedowns, if people actually listen.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

        And it might have been if they didn’t drag their feet so much.

      • vimmiewimmie@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently

        This is sort of where I keep going back to in my mind. Like, I’ve seen things about supposed redacting or whatnot. So, like, what is there to be released if supporters of the Current Admins had them for so long?

        Some like original copy of something somewhere that somebody secreted away?

        And, how does something like that get proven to be…legitimate? Especially to a point of actionable repercussions?

        I honestly just don’t understand how this all works. Hoping for the damn best though.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because they couldn’t, or at least not without potentially ruining the case while it was before the courts at the time?

    • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s all bread and circuses until the 1% have extracted the last iota of capital from the rest of us and the country finally collapses.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Dems have molesters/rapists on the list themselves. The difference is that we are not cultists and will gladly watch those perverts go to jail. Apparently MAGA just barely started caring about justice as it pertains to the files.

      Why were the files not released under Biden? Hell … Bill Clinton is on the list (shocking).

        • Wilco@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Everything is still in the “reportedly” quote stage, but it looks like Clinton went there for Epsteins 50th birthday party. He is on the flight logs.

          Remember that Epsteins “operation” supposedly worked by blackmail, so many people could have been invited and not taken the bait. If they went multiple times however … like Trump.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t see anyone saying this yet, but the Epstein files were sealed by a court order for Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of 2025. Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them - and possibly giving Ghislaine’s lawyers a slam dunk to get her off with a mistrial.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list, also the general public on the US, if you haven’t caught on yet are like 30% complete idiots. A good example of this is that many people in comments on Instagram or other social media have said ‘‘why would anyone even willingly fly on a plane called ‘the Lolita express’?’’ Because they can’t figure out that the press started calling Epstine’s plane that long after the accusations and convictions were over with. They’re even more confused that the pilot of the plant never saw ANY sexual behavior or implied sexual relationship of any minors on the plane or even adults on the plane. How couldn’t he tell?! Because Epstine was a blackmail con man, not a ‘‘hay everybody here’s all my dirty secrets! Look at this! It’s incriminating!’’ Man. Blackmail necessitates obfuscation, and likewise gaining access to wealthy targets ment he ALSO needs to appear harmless and well connected to other wealthy people, who only saw normal behavior. So this list, the flight logs, even the island visitors, will all be at the very least 50% innocent people, if not way higher numbers. You only need a few successful targets to get by with blackmail and if the targets all have lots of money and know eachother the last thing you want is for them to be aware your blackmailing them all at once. And if he never did blackmail and just ran a pedophile ring, the level of secrecy would still be crazy high and he’d still want to look innocent to the majority of people he knew that’s how all child abusers and rapists in general tend to behave.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list

        Biden wasn’t able to release it because a judge sealed it as part on an ongoing investigation. Don’t let that stop your ridiculous conspiracy theories.

        The same “donors” would likely also support the Democrats now voting to release them.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m saying if he was still president, not in the past. also my whole point is that the list is half or more full of innocent names, but people at large won’t be able to grasp that, so it will paint otherwise innocent people as involved in a pedophile sex ring or trafficking, or as blackmail targets when they did none of those things.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Who, me? look, all I’m saying is that the public at large can’t grasp that not everyone who walked past Epstein on the street is a full blow child sex trafficker. They will assume every single person he knew is full guilty when that’s just not how criminal conspiracy works, I wouldn’t be shocked to find only Him, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Trump were raping children.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released.

        That makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Why would they overwhelmingly vote to realease them then?

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because they COULDN’T release them under Biden. They were sealed by court order until January 2025.

      There is a lot of desperate “both sides” nonsense going on here but the fact remains, Democrats are voting to release them and Republicans are not. If Democrats wanted to cover them up, why would they be doing that?

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trust me bro one more rape charge on the rapist king and we beat fscist trust me bro. It will be a bombshell when everyone finds out what they already know and they SLAM him. One more scandal and we defeat facism trust me bro.

    • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’ll be far, far from the nail in the coffin, but we’re already seeing promising movement among what was normally staunch Trump supporters.

      It’s only one avenue to follow though. We still have to do what we can wherever we can.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s what really kills me about this whole thing. Dude has never, ever, ever faced a consequence for all the shit he’s done. I’m done hoping, man.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      MAGAs can’t resist cheating at every opportunity. Here we are again with standard election fraud on a micro basis, but we’re supposed to believe that they won the 2024 Election “Fair & Square?”

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not holding my breath but I’m really hoping that will help maga chuds clue in that the GOP are wholly dishonest.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but there are now two very distinct news spheres, and the one that they’re watching will simply not cover this story.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It has to at least fall under this:

            "§1001. Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

            (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), 108 Stat. 2147 .)"

            https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=49&f=treesort&num=1262

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m guessing Roberts Rules stuff.

      As a quick and dirty thing, you can call a voice vote of ayes and nays. If it’s not particularly close, it’ll be obvious what the outcome is, the Chair will call the result, and everyone moves on. However, any member can call bullshit on the Chair, and then it goes to a more formal process.

      So without watching the whole damn video, it’s probably that the voice vote went one way, the Chair said it was the other, got called on it, and the roll call vote went against him.

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is unsurprising.

      But forcing a recorded count does get those Republican Nays on record so they can be punished later.

  • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just browsed r/conservative for a bit to see the response there. Pleasantly surprised to see multiple posts where the top comment was something along the lines of “release everything, don’t care who is affected on either side”

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The video was fun to watch to watch.

    If my understanding is right, it just means this sub committee will now subpoena all documents. Not like it will be available to everybody, just available to the lawmakers. You must be a real pedophile-ophile to want to block your committee from having knowledge.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think GOP wants to get rid of Trump but keep MAGA. They’ve simply been unable to manipulate that outcome until now.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The only way they can bifurcate Trump from MAGA is if they have an equally “charismatic” strongman that can take his place. It would especially help if he’s young.

        And it’s not Vance.

        • mystik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Be careful what you wish for. It could end up being Musk, with a manchruian citizen in the seat.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not convinced it can be anyone. Trump is a remarkable combination of horrible, stupid, and snake-oil-salesman charismatic. Anyone less stupid, and the base can tell that he’s just pretending to be like them, and they don’t like it. Anyone less charismatic can’t sell the con. Anyone less horrible would actually be less horrible, so that’d actually be better for all of us, but again I think then the base would turn on them for being insufficiently horrible.

          About the only one I can think of on the public stage right now who checks all those boxes is Marjorie Taylor Greene, and she’s a wOmAn, which also disqualifies her for a good chunk of the Trump base.

          But then again, this is the stupidest timeline, so for all I know they’ll just decide that Ron DeSantis is their new god when Trump finally exits the scene and deny that they ever hated Ron’s stupid fucking guts.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            What a horrible world it’d be if MTG is the first female president of the US.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s why I keep my eye on Joe Rogan. I mean, folks tell me I’m nuts to think that a charismatic entertainer could make the transition to being President, but I’m not so sure. (/s, to be extra clear) I notice that he’s taking care to distance himself from the regime’s more-unpopular actions, but not break with it wholly.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I kinda agree, but IMO the better way to phrase it is that they don’t have a solid plan. Fascists are stupid. They have to be, right, because they’re building a system that is guaranteed to eat itself. Whoever is in charge always wants more power, which eventually must come from their cohorts, so you can’t do it as a team, at least not if people are using their brains.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a cult of personality, there is no MAGA without HitlerPig. The moment he assumes room temperature, the knives will come out, and the Dems can sit back and watch the bloodbath.

        Which brings up another point - the Republicans Party is dead, fully replaced by the MAGA Party, and the Dems should make that their policy. They should call an official press conference, declare the Republican Party to no longer exist, and start calling it the MAGA Party in ALL communications. The Republican Party should only be referred to in a historical context, like the Whigs.

        Kill the Republican Party, then watch them flail to revive it when MAGA collapses following HitlerPig glorious death.