• leftthegroup@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Want this news months ago? How are they “releasing” months old news? Or at least weeks old. I forget and have trouble keeping up with all his depressing antics.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was reported by the WSJ, they didn’t release the image and of course Trump and his minions said it was all made up. But we can now see Trump’s shitty drawing (it’s creepier than anyone imagined) and the WSJ reporting is now confirmed.

      • leftthegroup@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I know I’ve seen the image before now tho. Or maybe just an approximation based on a description? Dunno but it looks familiar. And not just because it reminds me of that level design in that Kirby game.

        • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It was an approximation. I don’t remember who exactly recreated the drawing, but the only difference between that and the actual one is that the woman’s body in the actual letter looks decidedly less… “mature”.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Clinton met with Netanyahu in the Oval Office in February 1997. Subsequently, according to testimony Lewinsky gave to the special counsel’s office, Clinton’s secretary Bettie Currie reached out to Lewinsky to invite her to an Oval Office meeting, telling her Clinton “had something important to tell her.”

    It would turn out to be their final sexual encounter, but Clinton also used the opportunity to tell her that “a foreign embassy” had tapped his phone and recorded their conversation, Lewinsky said. Clinton did not specify which embassy, though the meeting with Lewinsky came the month after his meeting with Netanyahu.

    https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/did-benjamin-netanyahu-blackmail

    This is the picture Jeffrey Epstein had hanging in his house

    • drhodl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is all cool and funky, but Clinton is not the POTUS ! Donny 2 Inches is POTUS, and is the one engaged in this cover up.

      Why do magats struggle to understand that more than one person can be guilty at the same time? Why does this inability always provide excuses for Donny 2 Weeks?

      You can hang Clinton, if he’s guilty, right next to the decaying corpse of Donny 2 Dolls, who is the far greater danger to little children everywhere.

      • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wow you are so smart, I never thought of that! Since you’re so clever, maybe you can answer a question I’ve been pondering:

        Do you think Jeffrey Epstein was the first or the only guy blackmailing politicians for Israel?

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why do you think Jeffrey Epstein needed to blackmail the current POTUS for Israel?

          They were friends. Connected by the same debauchery.

          • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The lines blur over many years. Trump associated with the Italian and Russian mob as well. While the former collapsed in the United States, I believe the latter got Kompromat on his filthy ass as well. He’s not very smart and he can’t help himself, therefore he’s at the mercy of his various handlers.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t doubt for a second this was Epstein’s true “purpose”, and that he collected blackmail material (or kompromat, as you prefer) for multiple intelligence agencies, including the CIA and FBI.

      This is why Barr had him killed. A bunch of old-school republican and Democratic monsters were in those videos.

      This whole thing underscores how weak the corporate news sewers are. They’re really poorly done PR, with very occasional random acts of journalism actually making it out the door.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They regularly squash stories that would be sensational and make them money. This is how we know they have been completely captured now.

        This was never more evident than when every news agency reported the words of Maxwell, the child rapist pimp liar, that Trump did nothing wrong for three weeks straight

        When the survivors showed up to tell their story crickets. They don’t even care about things that would make them a shit ton of money if it means hurting the interests of people who own them.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It was that way in 2016 when they tried to sell that whole “Oh he’s not that bad” bullshit. And in 2003 when they helped lie us into war. Again. And in 2000 when the SCROTUS threw the election to Bush. Etc. Nothing changes except how patient the earth is with us.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            For real, and if you look in history it goes all the way back the revolutionary war. It was always really messed up.

  • wshrader@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I voted for Trump. There is 0 defense for the stuff he’s doing. The best thing I’ve heard is all the higher ups are “apart of a club” that we’re not in. No matter the side, I just want to world better for everyone.

    • se7enfeet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why the fuck did you vote trump then?!?! Better for everyone?!?! Everyone told you he was going to do all this shit. I blame you. I blame every dumb mother fucker that is just like you. You ruined america because youre a fucking moron. Fuck you, asshole.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      So why did ypu vote for him, when he is a known child rapist?

      Or, are the doodles your line?

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You thought the candidate who made 30,573 documented lies during his first term was the guy you could trust to keep his promises ?

            • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              No rebounding is going to happen for many presidential terms. It’s much easier, and faster, to destroy than to build up. The damage to investment and trade relationships being done, and the dismantling of worker protections and support for industry and job development, is going to take decades to reclaim.

              • smeenz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                And that’s not even considering all the skilled government workers who have been fired and won’t be coming back in 2028. Or the loss of reputation internationally, or the loss of business from companies who have made alternative arrangements and are no longer doing business with the US

              • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                This is the really depressing part that people really aren’t understanding. We’ve had bad leadership before, but none that have done this much irreparable damage in such a short amount of time with effects that are making the entire world worse for the foreseeable future. But yeah, Harris would have been the same /s

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well, given the trend, we may not have another election.

              Trump thinks elections dont have to happen if he says there is a war.

            • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think community organizing is the key. Whether it is direct participation, or supporting local/independent initiatives, or trying to influence the established parties in your area. The bad actors thrive on division, misinformation, inaction, and apathy. And the common refrain is that people don’t have the resources, time or bandwidth to educate themselves or to contribute. More people need to see the redistribution of wealth upwards as a form of control. Measures that erode workers rights, equality, etc. further disempowers anyone not in the upper echelons [even those in the upper class but not in the ruling class]. We need to be willing to make sacrifices/concessions if it will benefit those with fewer advantages than ourselves specifically because they make up the foundations that allow us to exist as high up the chain as we currently are [even if that doesn’t feel very high]

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Apart” means distanced from. “A part” means a piece of.

      They’re not the same word. Of course, if you had received an education that had taught you the difference, then you wouldn’t have voted for trump.

    • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyzBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I want the World BETTER for Everyone so I Voted for the Man who Campaigned on LITERALLY making the World WORSE for the Majority of People!

      • se7enfeet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fuck this dude. Anyone that thought a vote for trump was a vote for everyone’s wellbeing is a fucking moron.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          “Harris is just as bad”

          Mind elaborating on why you think a sensible, middle-aged experienced prosecutor with decades of contacts in government was somehow just as bad as two 80-something year olds, and how you concluded that the best vote was for the guy literally wanting to be a dictator and who was following the project 2025 playbook to destroy America for Putin, was somehow your best choice ?

          Honestly, I have run out of patience with people who try to frame it thar trump was somehow their best choice of terrible options.

          I guess the only way to get through to you was to let him win so you could see it for yourself.

          • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’d have more sympathy for some of these people if they’d just admit they were lied to and were wrong, but no, every time I see it all we get is hemming and hawing around how they didn’t think it would be their own face getting eaten by the leopard.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why do you think a billionaire elite would even care about the working man, let alone make the world a better place for them? That kind of world wouldn’t allow them to be a billionaire in the first place.

          Also, Trump has shown a lot more dementia than Joe. Even before the elections.

      • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Given what they said regarding disagreeing with Trump’s current actions, why did you feel like your response was the best way to engage?
        After the repeated examples over the last decade, I think everyone in the world should have learned by now that shame, aggression, and shade dripping with schadenfreude doesn’t change opinions or actions.
        If you are truly concerned about making things worse for others, you might want to examine the way you interact with other human beings. Because the short term dopamine isn’t worth contributing to the division that’s been made worse by targeted, algorithmic influence.
        We are all being fed a curated version of reality designed to appeal to our biases and stoke fear and outrage. I think we need to learn to show some grace to people who we don’t fully agree with, who are trying to reach across the divide, and who might be coming to terms with the ways in which they may have been misled or caught up in an enticing movement.
        And I’m not saying this is easy. It certainly isn’t satisfying. I love barbed and bitter witicisms. Being shitty to someone who I feel deserves it scratches this itch in my brain that I am neither proud of, nor can deny. But it’s also the definition of being selfish, since it helps no one. So idk, you do you I guess?

          • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Honestly, for the person I responded to, doing literally nothing would have been better. I’m not suggesting we give people cookies for changing their minds [or whatever]. I’m just saying that being unconstructively critical is actively pushing against the kind of change and progress I would assume someone taking the position they are taking would want. Unless that’s not the objective and they are in fact trying to maintain the divide. That is possible. But assuming everyone is a bot or astroturfer is no way to live. Not hitting Post is always an option.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Being sad that your willfull ignorance is causing massive harm to millions, isn’t even a start to undoing that harm.

          Want to make me sympathetic? Do the work to fix that harm.

          • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            How is that not a start? In a world where we are fighting just to agree that a problem exists, acknowledging the problem is a step in the right direction. Is it worth celebrating? No. But saying it’s not even a start is intellectually dishonest. [To say nothing of invoking the harm caused by a mob, incited by grifters, and assigning the responsibility to an individual]

            And who said anything about being sympathetic? Do you have to sympathize with a person to not go out of your way to be shitty to them? [If so, that might be something you want to interrogate in yourself]

            And again, I’m not saying your anger, frustration, and/or indignation is unwarranted. But none who breathe are wholly innocent. I don’t know anything about you, but I think it is a safe assumption that, if you live in a western country, your family history does not go back more than 4-5 generations wherever you’re living. You likely live on colonized land. [And if not that, then some other industrialized atrocity you are complicit in?] What work have you done to fix that harm? What sympathy should be granted to you, should you ever be called to account? I’m not suggesting you need to do anything other than have some restraint and decency. Is that such a radical or outrageous thing?

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Everyone: Would you provide affordable healthcare, increase minimum wage, cancel student loans, defeat fascism and tax the rich?

    Democrats: Best I can do is release Trump’s birthday doodle given to Epstein, and Newsom’s tweets trolling Trump.

    Sorry to cut down the news, but Democrats really have to do more than just trolling Trump and Republicans. So far, I haven’t seen much serious efforts to roll back the fascism of Trump and Republicans.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You realize the American people essentially stripped Democrats of all power within our federal government after 4 years of meaningful legislation and solid recovery, right?

      All they can really do is state level stuff, which they are. Newsom in California. Pritzker in Illinois.

      If you want someone to blame, blame your fellow dumbass Americans.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Now I see why the bleeding heart liberal is a pejorative.

        Was not having enough numbers for the Republicans not stop them from filobustering every popular policies that had been proposed? Did Chuck Schumer and Dems do the same when he allowed the big beautiful bill that gutted Medicare and welfare? So much for vOtE bLuE nO mAtTeR wHo nonsense.

        You Americans today are embarrassing your progressive ancestors that stopped the Gilded age and put the Roosevelts in the White House. Because back then, opposition parties were actually oppositions, and people held their politicians accountable dearly. You mentioned you don’t know if Democrats will address what made fascism happen. They are suppose to be the good guys, right? You support them and they are the opposition. You should know what they are supposed to do.

        People are not saying to vote third party, what people sane enough to see what’s wrong is to hold the Dems more accountable and actually for them to grow a spine instead of doing performative opposition all the time.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bleeding heart is pure propaganda designed to frame someone who cares as stupid and unintelligent. This is of course the opposite of the truth. It is more doublethink brought to you by your masters and everytime you repeat it you give them more power.

          The real progressives were run out of politics in the US during the McCarthyism crisis. They have never returned and we remained a fascist nation once again purging anyone who disagrees.

          There are no good guys, just totalitarians versus neoliberals both fighting to control our imperial fascist oligarchy. When either of them win we all lose. The Democratic party has slightly more diversity of thought, but that ain’t saying much.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            “Bleeding heart” for me is someone-- sorry for the lack of a better word-- who has certain naïveté. All going on about decorum but doesn’t have what it takes to take the gloves off when needed. Because evil never sleeps.

            Americans have been conditioned to think within a carefully curated thought and frame by the capitalistic media to make normal folks timid.

            People could go on about two party system, but look at other countries, they also have two party system but they successfully elect third parties and unafraid to hold their politicians not doing their jobs accountable. What happened to Americans who got rid of monopolies in Gilded age and getting third parties electing into congress and senate? That’s my point. Now, Americans are inactive. It only took cutting Medicare and crashing the stock market for people to do something. Before? Nada. And that’s the thing, people only mobilise if their personal interests are affected. The solidarity of the past has been gone.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It definitely is old propaganda anyways and not a term brought up very often anymore. I can see the nuance in your view in regards to naivete.

              When I was younger it was often brought up when someone would talk about starving kids in Africa. Pundits would say, “another bleeding heart liberal” as a way to be dismissive and mocking of their feelings.

              It was almost always women they would do it to as well. So ultimately it was a derogatory sexist way to dismiss the concerns of women on social issues.

    • drhodl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Do something yourself, ya whiney little bitch ! Other than blame the Dems for the Republikkklans actions.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        And I’m guessing you are one of the neoliberals who are “guess we’re gonna die then” when Schumer allowed Trump bill without push back. Americans are so spineless. “Vote for lesser evil”. Are you saying they are evil and welcome it? You are disgracing your ancestors who fought hard to the end the Gilded age.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because their constituents voted for the Democrats to do their jobs? And is not having enough power at any given time prevented the Republicans from holding hostage of the government multiple times through filibuster?

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not really the point. Illustrating to his base that he’s not only a liar, but will go out of his way to throw any of them under the bus to corrupt our country is the goal. It’s working. Massively.

      If you think this is just trolling, you should probably go have a juice box and a nap and just sit this one out.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Illustrating to his base that he’s not only a liar, but will go out of his way to throw any of them under the bus to corrupt our country is the goal.

        Trump is well established to be a liar long ago, and he has been voted yet again and still has a substantial support base.

        It’s working. Massively.

        Is it? The only reason Trump is getting more push back now is because his economic agenda pissed everyone off. Ultimately, what people care first and foremost is economic security. If the stock market hadn’t been shook and Medicare is not cut, people would not really bat an eye on what he does next.

        Even what Democrats are doing is wanting to release the Epstein list and accuse the Republicans of being pedofiles, they still have not laid out their broader plan to address growing inequality and inflation. As we speak, even if Trump and Republicans are on negative approval rating, the Dems approval rating is not on the positive either albeit slightly higher.

        If the focus is on throwing gossips and scandals are what Dems are going to do while the rich and powerful rob people while distracted by it, then maybe go back to high school. You don’t quite understand both the MAGA cult mindset who are beyond convincing, and what the salt of the earth everyday folks really need.

        Even if Trump is disgraced beyond redemption, how is this going to put the genie back into the bottle that is fascism? Will the Dems address what made fascism take root in the US?

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You realize your diatribe is all about your anecdotal thoughts and opinions? How many of his die hard asshats you see out on YouTube yelling about this particular issue? Turning them against him is working. You’re wrong.

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know, I don’t keep up with his die hard asshats on YouTube, you tell us.

            When Trump said explicitly that he doesn’t want supporters that are obsessed with the Epstein stuff, that was a classic cult purge. He’s very much okay with losing people over the doodle, because the remaining die hard cultists will defend him to the grave, literally.

            It isn’t “massively working”, he’s using it to consolidate power. Now before you downvote and run away, can you answer this comment:

            Do Republicans have the numbers when they filibuster every popular proposals and bills? Dems should do the same if they are serious and whether they are in opposition or not.

            All they do is performative bullshit, because like the oligarchs who bent the knee, they’re all on the same side. The genocide supporting Democrats are not holding back on using every available tool because they still believe in civility, they don’t try hard because people like you are happy to give them every excuse for their minimal effort performative bullshit. The levers are known, Republicans use them all the time, there is no excuse.

            Polite Nazis are still Nazis. Demand better from your government.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Even if Trump is disgraced beyond redemption, how is this going to put the genie back into the bottle that is fascism? Will the Dems address what made fascism take root in the US?

            • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Are you familiar with the general concept of “order of operations”?

              You have to get rid of the fascist first, THEN you deal with the rest. You can’t do the latter first.

                • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yup.

                  If you had a normal number of brain cells going into the 2024 election you knew that Harris winning meant actual consequences for Trump and Harris losing meant zero consequences for Trump.

                  I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed an event that so massively changed the outcome of the future, and I was in high school when 9/11 happened. I 100% believe the repercussions of this election are more severe and far reaching than 9/11.

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                You have to get rid of the fascist first, THEN you deal with the rest. You can’t do the latter first.

                Will it? Dems didn’t even do anything in the past four years to prevent Trump taking power for the second time after his coup. Dems under Schumer have also allowed the big beautiful bill without significant push back. They are not acting like an actual opposition as they ought to be.

                • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Dems didn’t even do anything in the past four years to prevent Trump taking power for the second time after his coup.

                  They had a massive televised investigation that presented a shit ton of footage and witness testimony of the insurrection to make it clear to the American people what happened and the American people chose to believe it wasn’t a big deal and stripped Democrats of their power and handed it to the leader of the insurrection and his treasonous party.

                  Wanna play the blame game? Blame your fellow dumbass Americans.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Will the Dems address what made fascism take root in the US?

          I don’t know. But do you know what won’t do that? Not voting or voting 3rd party.

          Need proof?

          Everything since election day 2024 when we learned what happens when you don’t vote or vote 3rd party while an openly fascist party is circling the wagons.

          So please, keep on bitching about Democrats while we’re knee deep in the consequences of not voting for them. You are being helpful…

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      There were enough Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to release the picture, but there aren’t enough Democrats in the House and Senate to accomplish all the things you’re asking for. All things I completely agree we need, but they require votes.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        there aren’t enough Democrats in the House and Senate to accomplish all the things you’re asking for. All things I completely agree we need, but they require votes.

        Do Republicans have the numbers when they filibuster every popular proposals and bills? Dems should do the same if they are serious and whether they are in opposition or not.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Edit: I replied to the wrong comment while quoting the portion from here that I agree with. This comment was in response to OP.

          I don’t know, I don’t keep up with his die hard asshats on YouTube, you tell us.

          When Trump said explicitly that he doesn’t want supporters that are obsessed with the Epstein stuff, that was a classic cult purge. He’s very much okay with losing people over the doodle, because the remaining die hard cultists will defend him to the grave, literally.

          It isn’t “massively working”, he’s using it to consolidate power. Now before you downvote and run away, can you answer this comment:

          Do Republicans have the numbers when they filibuster every popular proposals and bills? Dems should do the same if they are serious and whether they are in opposition or not.

          All they do is performative bullshit, because like the oligarchs who bent the knee, they’re all on the same side. The genocide supporting Democrats are not holding back on using every available tool because they still believe in civility, they don’t try hard because people like you are happy to give them every excuse for their minimal effort performative bullshit. The levers are known, Republicans use them all the time, there is no excuse.

          Polite Nazis are still Nazis. Demand better from your government.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    His name is way less pubie than early mockups illustrated.

    Still creepy AF.

    Also, Trump doesn’t know how to draw boobs.

  • lmagitem@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t get it. They all know it. There are court testimonies. Knowing 10% of the facts, even a child with two brain cells can make the connection. Why are they all acting like it’s the-thing-that-must-not-be-named or something?

    • BearGun@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn’t been proven in court (and likely never will be).

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It takes a lot of bravery for someone to come forward with an accusation against some nameless cretin in their hometown.

      I’d imagine it would take a lot more bravery to come forward with an accusation against the most famous cretin of all time, especially when he can deport, imprison, or kill you or anyone you love, legally, with no recourse.

    • BearGun@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn’t been proven in court (and likely never will be).

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Forget sued. It’ll be ruled a suicide for sure. Or maybe you just get deported to a war zone.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unless you all band together and make a Criminal complaint?

        Then again, he is a king now so yeah…