If real people got powers, do you think they would all become corrupt, evil psychopaths?

  • dil@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nah, I think itd be 60% good people but the worst 10% would be in power pretending to be better than those good enough people

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I like how Vought is (among other things) so much like American professional sports organizations, the NFL in particular. I could definitely see supes being handled that way.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    No. If it’s just the getting powers and it’s not like a toxin thing that actually corrupts/poisons.

    Absolutley there will be those that need to be put down hard, but I don’t think it would be as set up in The Boys

    Part of why that world works the way it does is Vought. The other is that Homelander is tiers above the other characters and he is a psychopath raised by an evil organization. Given that no one was able to compare to Homelander he couldn’t be challenged. His treatment of other supes is a large reason why he is as bad as he is, and why others end up doing so many bad things. They do things because of shareholders profits not for doing of good and they have a monopoly on supers

    There would still be chaos, but it wouldn’t be like that show, I don’t think because there are many people that would actually just want to be helpful

    Fame and fortune already makes people nutty, or rewards bad behavior maybe, but I don’t think the powers themselves would corrupt people and make them evil.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Part of why that world works the way it does is Vought

      You act like we don’t have Vought in the real world already. Vought is literally just a parody of Amazon, and not just because it’s made by Amazon Prime

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t say we didn’t. Not sure why you think I’m ignoring companies like Amazon. If they operated as freely as Vought does then yes it would look the same, but Vought created supers in The Boys and controlled access to them. Thats where I was pretty clear about establishing my opinion and how the real world is different from the world of The Boys.

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Watchmen was a pretty good depiction of this as well.

    Someone with literal godlike powers would probably lose touch with human concerns eventually. People who put on masks and start fights with criminals are deeply unwell.

    They aren’t paragons of society. They’re deeply fucked up people.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The comic series, yes. The TV started similar, but I think it has been very gradually Marvelizing. S1of Boys was fairly loyal and realistic.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Season 4…was…absokutr garbage 1 was solid I enjoyed 2, 3 was fun because of soldier boy… Then the finale was like wtf… And the season 4 is some of the worst television ever made holy shit…

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sounds like you’re of the group that thought homelander was the good guy. When you realized that homelander is trump, you got mad and decided you hate the show.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nope, cause pharmaceutical company would produce a drug that you take for a short time and never need again. Not enough profit. And they would have no actual control over the superheros. In the boys, all of the sups seemed to care what the public thought of them so much, they would do what the corp wanted. In reality, the ones who didn’t care would outnumber the ones who did. And they would just kill whoever they wanted, and threaten to kill others to get what they wanted. Kinda like the oligarchy we have today, but with far less constraint, and no need to even try to hide things like being pedos and racists and such.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      In reality, the ones who didn’t care would outnumber the ones who did.

      That’s not true. Most people care about public perception. From dictatorships to narcissists to normal people

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        There are certainly people who do. But I think they are the minority. They do sort of bunch up though. So if you are one, you probably don’t realize you are the minority.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’d say theybare the majority. Dictators care about their prescription. And look at all the people online trying to sell their public image.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Dictators care about how they are perceived because they used skills in manipulating how they are perceived to get into the position they are in. Making it a self selecting group. But when you change “how” they get there to simply be that they were given superpowers at birth, you remove the self selection. So now it is just a random sampling of the population, which in my opinion skews toward not caring as much about how they are percieved if they don’t need to.

  • Depends on who gets superpowers, and how such powers are acquired.

    The broad strokes of The Boys makes some degree of sense if we start with the premise that some megacorporation controls the manufacture and publicity of all supers. However, if supers can come from other sources, then what limitations are we putting on the premise?

    I am of the opinion that most people are inherently good. Most people are also inherently stupid and cowardly, but keep in mind that these circles on the venn diagram are independent of each other despite some overlap. However, if given an opportunity to choose between helping and hurting, without any fear of repercussions either way, most people would choose to help.

    There’s a popular quote: “power corrupts”, which is a shortened version of “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. I think this quote misses something fundamental: “power attracts the corruptable”. In a world without gods, no one I’d ever trust to be one would ever actively make the choice to become one unless it was forced on them somehow.

    If superpowers were distributed more randomly, then the odds of us getting a superman instead of a homelander improve greatly. Still a dice throw though.

  • je_skirata@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The realistic thing about The Boys is that it isn’t a world where normal people get superpowers, it’s an evil company making superheroes into celebrities for profit.

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It isn’t the super powers that make them assholes, the seven just draws in assholes who abuse the ones that aren’t.

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If people had superpowers, vats of trauma and ego issues, and megacorps wanted to wrangle it for profit and control… absolutely yes.

    This would totally happen in the US and other countries. 100%. No doubt.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    Further especially with powers granted from an injectable serum, the kind of people naturally drawn to it will already be the kind of people seeking power for their own ends.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      x-men under xavier, is too goody two shoes, basically toeing the line of the us, realistically its more like Magnetos side that would be more realistic.

      • cmbabul@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No i meant superpowers arose as a natural mutation and not the result of a chemical compound. Not ideologically