• Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    (from left to right) a) trying to look slim b) about to escape from prison in 1930 c) trying to confound enemy nation’s Navy

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Despite being the same lovely woman, I am infinitely more attracted to her in the horizontal stripes.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        When they said the same pose, they just mean they are front facing, arms to the side, as opposed to different positions for each dress. It’s pretty darn close. She had to change dresses between shots, so the poses aren’t going to be perfectly identical, but they are close enough to make the point that a person looks different depending on the stripes.

        Do you really think that extra half inch of daylight between her arm and body somehow faked the result?

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The way to do this would be to edit the dress in Photoshop or similar. One picture, three designs and the model is the same in each.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nope, I wouldn’t fully believe it. Actual photos are much more convincing.

              I don’t trust any photo manipulation for any reason. I understand that it is often necessary for economic, artistic, or graphic design efficiency, but for things I have to trust, I want real photos.

        • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Absolutely. When the post is about how things look different based on the patterns chosen, everything we’re looking at has to be the same or we can’t really compare.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            This isn’t a peer-reviewed drug study, it’s just a demonstration. Things don’t have to be absolutely perfect to demonstrate the basic concept that the orientation of the stripes makes a difference in perception.

            If she was facing front on one pose, sideways for another, and facing backwards for another, I’d agree with you. But three front facing photos, in the same pose, shot from the same distance in the same light, is good enough to demonstrate the difference effectively. I would much rather have this display, over a faked display of the same photo, with the dress patterns applied with AI or something. Then I would doubt the result. But doing it this way convinces me.

      • Jimjim@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also the i think the different collars matters. Low No collar, high black collar, high no collar.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s funny how they also represent an era. Vertical stripes=50s horizontal=90s/early 2000s, slanted =futurama

  • melvisntnormal@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can someone repost this using something other than Imgur? They block the UK and Mullvad (though if someone is using Mullvad and can access it, let me know what server you’re using please)

    EDIT: nevermind, I can see it through the web version of Lemmy, just not through Sync or Imgur directly

  • DearMoogle@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Brb tossing out any horizontal stripes I have left from my closet.

    Wait what about flannel? The stripes are perpendicular, so would they cancel each other out?🤔

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Horizontal stripes actually look great on a skinny person. Or any person, if the pattern is good by itself — while these black/white stripes aren’t really a shining example of that (though they would work on a twig-shaped heroine in a 60s French new-wave film).

      Vertical stripes are typically boring imo.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Horizontal lines are known to do that but I think the photos aren’t equivalent either way. If you cover the dress up or shoulders down, the middle one has a bigger gap between her legs and wider face without being able to see the stripes from what I see.

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Loading it into an editor she has about an inch less per hip in the diagonal picture. Its pretty significant.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Flannel’s plaid disrupts any curves so it’s pretty good for covering up bellies in particular. A big reason I’m a fan of the season of flannel (plus scarfs are nice, too).

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Plaid is great in all seasons. I have many pearl snap plaid shirts ranging from thick and warm flannel to super thin beach flannel to just the cotton shirts.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Something feels manipulated about this, but it also feels like the author/photographer went out of their way to make sure you couldn’t prove it was manipulated

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you zoom in and measure distances in pixels you’ll see it’s manipulated.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What you’re likely seeing as throwing you off is differences because this is an actual human wearing this - PLUS it’s essentially an optical illusion. This isn’t 3 versions of the same image with just the pattern changed. So yeah, these are actually not perfectly matching up if you overlay them on top of each other. I wouldn’t say manipulated per se, just that they’re 3 different images so they’ll have some differences.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree with you, but if you measure the width of the dress at the tip of her fingers, the left and right are about 99-100 pixels, while the middle one is 105 pixels wide. Her face in all three images is about 38-39 pixels wide (measured at the earlobe), so that rules out they stretched the entire image slightly. But 5 pixels is significant enough to kind of muddy the validity of the OP’s message since it no longer rules out all but the appearance of the dress. It sadly happens that sometimes effects are exaggerated, even when there is a real effect at play.

        • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, for sure. When I did the overlay I noticed the hands didn’t match up, so I had to look close at the pose to see it’s 3 different images with 3 different real dresses. Sort of defeats the purpose of doing this entirely.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup.

        So let’s take the body/pose on the right, copy it to all three positions mask the dress only, and overlay only the dress pattern in the same mask to actually show the differences between the patterns only.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bingo

        Look at the amount of visible background inside the elbows. They are each increasing in conforming the body as you move to the right.

      • MeatsOfRage@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I feel this would be better as a Photoshop job. Keep the same base and just change the pattern. I guess it might be hard to have the lines follow the shape of the body though

        • absentbird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Maybe one dress with three differently colored stripes, then you could filter it so each image only showed one pattern and erased the other two.